Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Consumers often find it challenging to assess meat sensory quality, influenced by tenderness and intramuscular fat (IMF). This study aims to develop a computer vision system (CVS) using smartphone images to classify beef and pork steak tenderness (1), predicting shear force (SF) and IMF content (2), and performing a comparative evaluation between consumer assessments and the method's output (3). The dataset consisted of 924 beef and 514 pork steaks (one image per steak). We trained a deep neural network for image classification and regression. The model achieved an F1-score of 68.1 % in classifying beef as tender. After re-categorizing the dataset into 'tender' and 'tough', the F1-score for identifying tender increased to 76.6 %. For pork loin tenderness, the model achieved an F1-score of 81.4 %. This score slightly improved to 81.5 % after re-categorization into two classes. The regression models for predicting SF and IMF in beef steak achieved an R value of 0.64 and 0.62, respectively, with a root mean squared prediction error (RMSEP) of 16.9 N and 2.6 %. For pork loin, the neural network predicted SF with an R value of 0.76 and an RMSEP of 9.15 N, and IMF with an R value of 0.54 and an RMSEP of 1.22 %. In 1000 paired comparisons, the neural network correctly identified the more tender beef steak in 76.5 % of cases, compared to a 46.7 % accuracy rate for human assessments. These findings suggest that CVS can provide a more objective method for evaluating meat tenderness and IMF before purchase, potentially enhancing consumer satisfaction.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109675 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!