[Not Available].

Introduction: Several non-invasive tests (NIT) have been reported for predicting liver fibrosis to avoid percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB).

Aim: To evaluate the performance of NIT in Tunisian patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

Methods: We calculated the ASAT/platelet ratio index (APRI), GGT-to-platelet ratio (GPR), Fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4), and RDW/platelet ratio (RPR). The accuracy of NIT was compared with the Metavir score for the detection of liver fibrosis stage using the area under the ROC curves (AUROC).

Results: Seventy-seven CHB patients were included. For predicting significant fibrosis, the AUROC of GPR (0.81; CI95% [0.68-0.93]; P < 0.001) was significantly higher than that of RPR (0.67; CI95% [0.52-0.82]; P = 0.03) and FIB-4 (0.746; CI95% [0.61-0.88]; P = 0.002), but was similar to APRI (0.88; CI95% [0.79-0.97]; P < 0.001). For advanced fibrosis, the AUROC of GPR (0.93; CI95% [0.84-1]; P < 0.001) was higher than that of RPR (0.83; CI95% [0.69-0.97]; P < 0.001) and FIB-4 (0.88; CI95% [0.76-0.99]; P < 0.001), but similar to APRI (0.93; CI95% [0.87-0.99]; P < 0.001). For predicting cirrhosis, the AUROC of GPR (0.98; CI95% [0.95-1]; P < 0.001) was higher than that of APRI (0.95; CI95% [0.90-1]; P = 0.02), similar to RPR (0.99; CI95% [0.98-1]; P < 0.001) but lower than that of FIB-4 (1; CI95% [1-1]; P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, APRI (OR = 3.78; P = 0.002) and FIB-4 (OR = 2.65; P = 0.01) were independent predictors of significant fibrosis. GPR was the only independent predictor of advanced fibrosis (OR = 4.64; P = 0.001) and FIB-4 was the independent predictor of cirrhosis (OR = 2.85; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: GPR does not demonstrate significant advantages over APRI, FIB-4, and RPR in identifying liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).