Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether an A-PRF + membrane can lower the fistula rate in patients undergoing primary palatoplasty. A total of 20 children were included: 10 were randomized and included in the platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) group, and 10 were assigned to the control group. Before two-flap palatoplasty was performed, the cleft's width was measured. The patients in the PRF group underwent an intraoperative collection of 5 ml venous blood, which was centrifugated and pressed onto an A-PRF + membrane. Subsequently, the membrane was placed between the oral and nasal mucosal layers. The control group underwent the same procedure without the addition of A-PRF+. The need for transfusions or postoperative intensive care was registered. All children were followed up at 10 days, 1, 2, 3, and 6 months, and after more than 6 months and the occurrence of fistulae and need for a second palatal operation was then evaluated. After more than six months postoperatively, only two fistulae (10%) remained and had to undergo secondary palatoplasty (p = 1.00). Moreover, the blood transfusion rate did not differ significantly (p = 1.00). A-PRF + might be beneficial in cleft closure, but further randomized studies with larger patient cohort are needed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2024.10.005 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!