AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study investigates the cost-effectiveness of a digital stress management intervention for employees versus a waitlist control group over six months, focusing on health costs and productivity losses.
  • - Results indicate that the intervention is likely to be cost-effective from both societal and employer perspectives, with a high probability of being dominant and providing a positive return on investment.
  • - Overall, the findings suggest that digital stress management programs not only improve employee wellbeing but also offer economic benefits, making them a worthwhile investment for employers.

Article Abstract

Background: Stress is highly prevalent and known to be a risk factor for a wide range of physical and mental disorders. The effectiveness of digital stress management interventions has been confirmed; however, research on its economic merits is still limited.

Objective: This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, and cost-benefit of a universal digital stress management intervention for employees compared with a waitlist control condition within a time horizon of 6 months.

Methods: Recruitment was directed at the German working population. A sample of 396 employees was randomly assigned to the intervention group (n=198) or the waitlist control condition (WLC) group (n=198). The digital stress management intervention included 7 sessions plus 1 booster session, which was offered without therapeutic guidance. Health service use, patient and family expenditures, and productivity losses were self-assessed and used for costing from a societal and an employer's perspective. Costs were related to symptom-free status (PSS-10 [Perceived Stress Scale] score 2 SDs below the study population baseline mean) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. The sampling error was handled using nonparametric bootstrapping.

Results: From a societal perspective, the digital intervention was likely to be dominant compared with WLC, with a 56% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) of €0 per symptom-free person gained. At the same WTP threshold, the digital intervention had a probability of 55% being cost-effective per QALY gained relative to the WLC. This probability increased to 80% at a societal WTP of €20,000 per QALY gained. Taking the employer's perspective, the digital intervention showed a probability of a positive return on investment of 78%.

Conclusions: Digital preventive stress management for employees appears to be cost-effective societally and provides a favorable return on investment for employers.

Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00005699; https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00005699.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538874PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/48481DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stress management
20
digital stress
16
management intervention
12
digital intervention
12
universal digital
8
intervention employees
8
waitlist control
8
control condition
8
group n=198
8
employer's perspective
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!