Economic, Environmental, and Social Value of Virtual Care in Otolaryngology: Sustainability in Quality Improvement Framework.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Published: October 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate the economic, environmental, and social effects of implementing virtual care for Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery patients using a Sustainability in Quality Improvement framework.
  • Analyzing data from over 41,000 appointments revealed that virtual visits, which comprised 18.1% of total visits, saved an average of $87.50 per visit, resulting in total savings of $640,300, along with significant reductions in fuel and carbon emissions.
  • The findings indicate that virtual care not only offers financial and environmental benefits but also ensures equitable access for patients from various social backgrounds, as indicated by no significant differences in marginalization scores between virtual and in-person visits.

Article Abstract

Objective: Apply the Sustainability in Quality Improvement framework to virtual care for Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) patients to understand the economic, environmental, and social impacts.

Methods: This project consisted of retrospective analysis of anonymized data from all appointments that took place in three academic ambulatory OHNS clinics (pediatrics, head and neck, and otology/neurotology) from fiscal years of 2021 to 2023. Data were obtained from our institution's Virtual Care Dashboard. The following metrics were calculated: travel costs avoided with virtual appointments (economic value), fuel and carbon emissions avoided with virtual appointments (environmental value), and differences in Ontario Marginalization (ON-Marg) Index scores between patients seen virtually versus in-person (social value).

Results: A total of 41,343 visits occurred over the 2-year period (18.1% virtual). Nearly all virtual visits were by telephone (99.6%). The average cost savings per virtual care visit was $87.50, and total cost savings across all 3 clinics was $640,300. Total environmental savings were 82,500 L of fuel and 246.6 metric tons of carbon emissions. There were no statistical differences in monthly average marginalization (ON-Marg) indices in patients seen virtually compared to in-person.

Discussion: Virtual care demonstrated financial and environmental savings for OHNS patients that can accumulate over multiple appointments. No difference in ON-Marg indices between patients assessed virtually versus in-person suggests that virtual care was accessible for patients regardless of social background.

Implications For Practice: Our data suggests that virtual care may be a viable complement for delivering OHNS care that leads to fiscal and environmental savings for patients and ensures equitable access to care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

virtual care
28
environmental savings
12
virtual
11
care
9
economic environmental
8
environmental social
8
sustainability quality
8
quality improvement
8
improvement framework
8
ohns patients
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!