A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Biomechanical properties analysis of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with transpedicular oblique screw fixation. | LitMetric

Objective: An alternative to conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is a PLIF with transpedicular oblique screw fixation system. An assessment of new fixation system's viability and efficacy is conducted through a comparison of its biomechanical properties with those of conventional PLIF.

Method: A comprehensive finite element model (FEM) of the lumbar regions L1-L5 was developed and the surgical segment L3-L4 was chosen to comprise the surgical models of both traditional PLIF and new PLIF. In new PLIF model, an analysis was conducted on segmental range of motion (RoM), cage stress, inferior endplates stress, vertebral stress, and internal fixation stress. Three-dimensional printers are utilized to fabricate and assemble the fusion cage and vertebrae, and compression test machines are employed to execute physiological load and extreme load experiments on new PLIF, so as to verify the accuracy of the FEM analysis and the mode of fatigue exhibited by new PLIF.

Results: In new PLIF, the maximum stress on the inferior endplates under physiological loads was reduced in comparison to conventional PLIF. While the maximum stress on the cage, vertebral body, and screw increased, it remained within an acceptable range. The experimental data indicates that new fixation system can endure a vertical load exceeding 2800 N and an ultimate bending moment of 77 Nm.

Conclusion: The new PLIF exhibits a comparable RoM to its predecessor, simultaneously mitigating inferior endplate stress and accommodating physiological loads, which reduce the amount of surgical incision and fusion fixation instruments. Consequently, it emerges as a sanguine surgical approach to fuse the degenerative lumbar spine.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11491909PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38929DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

plif plif
12
plif
9
biomechanical properties
8
posterior lumbar
8
lumbar interbody
8
interbody fusion
8
transpedicular oblique
8
oblique screw
8
screw fixation
8
fixation system
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!