Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: To compare upper, middle and lower calyceal accesses for prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy regarding stone-free rates, residual stones, haemoglobin drop and fluoroscopic time.
Methods: The prospective comparative clinical study was conducted from September 2018 to March 2021 at Al- Yarmouk Teaching Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq, and comprised patients of either gender aged 18-78 years with renal stones treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. They were divided into three groups on the basis of calyx access: upper calyx G1, mid-calyx G2, and lower calyx G3. Procedure-related parameters, such as fluoroscopic time, stone-free rates and haemoglobin drop, were analysed in detail. Patients were followed up within 1-week postsurgery through complete blood count, ultrasound and computerised tomography. Data was analysed using SPSS 27.
Results: Of the 151 patients with a mean age of 46.01±14.7 years, 89(58.9%) were males and 62(41.1%) were females. There were 63(41.7%) patients in G1, 38(25.2%) in G3 and 50(33.1%) in G3. The diameter of renal stones ranged from 20-60mm. There were 45(71.4%) patients with stone-free outcome in G1, 22(57.9%) in G2 and 37(74%) in G3 (p>0.05). There was no significant difference in the mean haemoglobin drop among the groups (p>0.05).
Conclusions: No significant intergroup difference was observed in terms of access in the sequelae regarding residual stone and haemoglobin drop.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.47391/JPMA-BAGH-16-11 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!