AI Article Synopsis

  • In Pavlovian conditioning, the strength of responses depends on the probability of reinforcement, but this study controlled for reinforcement rates to better understand this relationship.
  • Two experiments with mice showed that varying the probability of reinforcement influenced response rates during training and extinction phases, even when the overall reinforcement rate was constant.
  • The findings suggest that both the probability of reinforcement and the rate at which it is delivered play important roles in behavior, challenging existing learning theories to incorporate these factors more effectively.

Article Abstract

In Pavlovian conditioning, the strength of a conditioned response is a function of the probability of reinforcement. However, manipulations of probability are often confounded with changes in the rate of reinforcement. Two between-group experiments in mice evaluated the effect of the probability of reinforcement, while controlling the rate of reinforcement, on appetitive conditioning and extinction. Experiment 1 equated the reinforcement rate by manipulating the number of reinforcements received in each reinforced trial in a critical group (one vs. two consecutive rewards). The results of this experiment showed that probability influenced the rate of responses in acquisition, even when controlling the reinforcement rate. Experiment 2 further assessed the role of probability on behavior while controlling the rate of reinforcement during the conditioned stimulus (CS) using a split-trial design, in which the total CS time was held constant but presented in different numbers of discrete trials (e.g., 50% reinforcement with two 12 s CS's vs. 100% reinforcement with a 24 s average CS duration). This experiment confirmed that probability influenced response rates, and both the probability and rate of reinforcement affected the proportion of trials with responses. Together, these results suggest that the probability of reinforcement, while having little effect on the speed at which responses emerged, affects responding even when the rate of reinforcement is held constant. The results challenge formal learning theories to account for the effects of both the probability and rate of reinforcement. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xan0000386DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rate reinforcement
28
reinforcement
14
probability rate
12
probability reinforcement
12
probability
10
rate
9
controlling rate
8
reinforcement rate
8
probability influenced
8
held constant
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!