AI Article Synopsis

  • The review highlights common mistakes in diagnosing primary cluster headaches (CHs) using seven case examples to illustrate these pitfalls.
  • Recent findings suggest that while CHs and migraines share some similarities, such as genetic factors and autonomic features, they also have distinct characteristics that can aid in differentiation.
  • Key clinical features, such as restlessness during attacks, are crucial for diagnosing CHs and distinguishing them from other headache disorders, particularly within the group of Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalalgias (TACs).

Article Abstract

Purpose Of Review: To describe different pitfalls in the diagnosis of primary cluster headaches (CHs) with the guidance of seven case vignettes.

Recent Findings: The question of whether primary CHs and migraines are totally different entities has been long debated. Autonomic features can be detected in as many as 60% of migraine patients. Although some genetic similarities have been found, CACNA1A mutations have not been detected among CH patients with hemimotor aura in contrast to hemiplegic migraine. Recently, functional MRI studies have shown that the left thalamic network was the most discriminative MRI feature in distinguishing migraine from CH patients. Compared to migraine, CH patients showed decreased functional interaction between the left thalamus and cortical areas mediating interception and sensory integration. However, clinically the most significant feature had been the restlessness and agitation seen during headache attacks patients with CHs. This feature is also important in distinguishing cluster patients from other patients having other trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias except for a subset of patients with hemicrania continua. CH is an important member of the group of headache disorders characterized by their association with one or more autonomic features in the trigeminal nerve distribution and termed Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalalgias (TACs). Although CH is a relatively rare condition, judged by the distress it generally causes to the affected individual, early diagnosis and institution of appropriate therapy seem mandatory. Correct diagnosis of CHs needs avoidance of pitfalls. Such pitfalls generally include differentiation from migraine, differentiation from other side locked headache disorders, from other trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs), and lastly, recognition of rare presentations of cluster-like manifestations with hemiplegic aura and simulating trigeminal and glossopharyngeal neuralgias. Differentiation between primary and symptomatic CHs related to sellar pathologies and systemic medical conditions is of equal importance. In the present review such issues are discussed with the assistance of seven case vignettes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11910-024-01381-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

migraine patients
12
trigeminal autonomic
12
autonomic cephalalgias
12
pitfalls diagnosis
8
cluster headaches
8
autonomic features
8
patients
8
feature distinguishing
8
headache disorders
8
cephalalgias tacs
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!