Does Cruciate Ligament Substitution and Implant Asymmetry Make a Difference for Total Knee Arthroplasty Kinematics? A Multi-Implant Evaluation.

Background: The non-implanted knee differs in comparison to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs, with regard to asymmetry and functionality of the anterior cruciate ligament and the posterior cruciate ligament. While surgeons may choose to implant either posterior stabilized (PS) or bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS) TKAs, substituting for one or both cruciate ligaments, the effects of symmetry versus asymmetry in substituting TKA designs have not been widely analyzed to determine possible benefits. Therefore, the objective of this research study was to determine if either TKA asymmetry and/or anterior ligament stabilization can lead to more normal-like kinematics and clinical benefit for patients.

Methods: In vivo, femoro-tibial kinematics for 64 subjects were evaluated in this retrospective study. Overall, 10 subjects had a normal, nonimplanted knee, 20 had a BCS TKA, and 34 had one of two different PS TKAs. All three TKAs had varying degrees of symmetry incorporated into the design, and all were implanted by the same surgeon and were analyzed using fluoroscopy during a deep knee bend.

Results: At full extension, the BCS TKA subjects demonstrated a statistically more anterior position of both condyles compared to both PS TKAs. The BCS TKA subjects also experienced more posterior femoral rollback (PFR) and axial rotation in early flexion and from full extension to maximum knee flexion. Additionally, the TKAs in this study having asymmetry experienced greater amounts of PFR and weight-bearing knee flexion.

Conclusions: The results from this study indicated that in early flexion, the anterior cam/post mechanism does pull the femoral component more anterior, and all TKAs experienced PFR when the posterior cam engaged the post. The asymmetric designs also achieved greater rollback and axial rotation compared to the symmetric designs.