Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: To assess whether infants born to women with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) have an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes after frozen embryo transfer (FET) compared with women without a history of infertility or RPL.
Design: Retrospective cohort study utilizing the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System database between 2014 and 2020.
Setting: Not applicable.
Patient(s): Patients in the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System database who underwent their first FET resulting in live birth either with a diagnosis of RPL (cases n = 3,299) or without a history of RPL or infertility, the comparison population being tubal ligation (TL) only (n = 1,408).
Intervention(s): Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measure(s): Low birthweight (<2,500 g), additional outcomes included gestational age (continuous), birthweight (continuous), preterm delivery (<37 weeks), mode of delivery, and neonatal death, defined as death before the completion of the 28th day of life.
Result(s): We observed no statistically significant difference in low birthweight, birthweight overall, mode of delivery, or risk of neonatal death between patients with RPL compared with women with TL who underwent their first FET, resulting in live birth. Patients with history of RPL compared with TL utilizing FET were more likely to have a later gestational age at delivery. Patients with RPL were also less likely to have a preterm delivery (imputed adjusted odds ratio, 0.75; 0.64-0.89) than the patients with TL. Furthermore, performing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in both patients with RPL or TL did not impact perinatal outcomes compared with patients who did not undergo PGT-A.
Conclusion(s): Patients with history of recurrent pregnancy loss do not have an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes when they undergo FET compared with patients without infertility or RPL. In addition, performing in vitro fertilization/PGT-A in patients with RPL does not adversely impact birth outcomes of their infants.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.10.016 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!