Research Question: Are there significant differences between cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) after short or extended embryo culture when comparisons are performed per cycle?
Design: This French national study included all IVF cycles performed from January 2016 to December 2019 with at least one cleaved embryo at day 2. The day 2/3 and day 5/6 groups were identified using the National Biomedicine Agency register. Only attempts involving the vitrification method were included. CLBR was assessed with 1 and 2 years of follow-up using a logistic regression model. The evolution of CLBR per cycle was compared over 1 year of follow-up.
Results: In total, 133,250 cycles met the inclusion criteria (70,528 and 62,722 in the day 2/3 and day 5/6 groups). In multivariate analysis including several patient and cycle characteristics, the CLBR per cycle was significantly lower in the day 5/6 compared with the day 2/3 group. A significantly higher rate of fresh embryo transfer cancellation was observed in the day 5/6 compared with the day 2/3 group. The evolution of the CLBR was significantly different in favour of the day 2/3 group in cases with three or fewer day 2 embryos, whatever the patient's age, in their two first attempts as well as in their third or further attempts.
Conclusions: Overall, the nationwide results per cycle suggest that extended embryo culture until the blastocyst stage, even when used in combination with vitrification, could not improve live birth rates. Moreover, where three or fewer day 2 embryos are obtained, it might be preferable to use the short embryo culture strategy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104384 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!