A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Distal blocking screw augmentation in ulnar intramedullary nail fixation of adult forearm diaphyseal fractures. | LitMetric

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of distal blocking screws on the stability and healing of ulnar diaphyseal fractures treated with intramedullary (IM) nails. The primary research question was whether the addition of distal blocking screws enhanced fracture stabilization and promoted faster healing than the standard IM nailing techniques.

Methods: This retrospective study reviewed medical records of 30 patients with ulnar diaphyseal fractures treated from February 2018 to September 2023. The patients were divided into two groups: those treated using IM nails alone ( = 17) and those treated with using IM nails with distal blocking screws ( = 13). The surgical time, medullary canal space, fracture healing time, and complications were assessed. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Grace and Eversmann rating system, the DASH scores, and the VAS scores.

Results: The addition of distal blocking screws resulted in a slightly longer surgical time (56 min vs 47 min). However, the group with distal blocking screws had smaller medullary canal space and showed significantly faster fracture healing times (2.3 months vs 3.9 months; = .036). There were no reported complications of nonunion, nerve injury, or infection in the distal blocking screw group, whereas the IM nail-only group had one case of nonunion (5.7%).

Conclusion: The use of distal blocking screws in conjunction with IM nails for ulnar diaphyseal fractures improves fracture stability and promotes faster healing.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10225536241295520DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

distal blocking
32
blocking screws
24
diaphyseal fractures
16
ulnar diaphyseal
12
distal
8
blocking screw
8
fractures treated
8
addition distal
8
faster healing
8
treated nails
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!