Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Introduction: In 2021, the USPSTF lowered the recommended age of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening initiation from 50 to 45 years. This study assessed clinician response to the updated guideline in a major health system.
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of average-risk, CRC screening-naïve adults aged 45-50 years with a primary care appointment between July 2018 and February 2023. The authors defined the pre-guideline change period as July 2018-February 2020 (pre-period) and the post-guideline change period as July 2021-February 2023 (post-period). Clinician ordering of any CRC screening type was assessed. Mixed effects Poisson regression was used to model the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of a patient receiving a screening order, including an interaction between age (45-49 years versus 50 years) and time period (pre- versus post-guideline change.) Variation in screening orders were also described by calendar quarter and clinician.
Results: There were 28,114 patients in the pre-period and 22,509 in the post-period. Compared to patients aged 40-49 years in the pre-period, those in the post-period were more likely to have screening ordered (IRR=12.1; 95% CI=11.3-13.0). The screening ordering rate increased for patients aged 50 years from the pre- to the post-period (IRR=1.08; 95% CI=1.01, 1.16) and was slightly higher than that of patients aged 45-49 years in the post-period (IRR=1.08; 95% CI=1.02, 1.14). All clinicians increased their ordering rate for patients aged 45-49 years. Within 5 months of the guideline change, the ordering rate for patients aged 45-49 years and 50 years was nearly the same.
Conclusions: Rapidly following the guideline change, clinicians increased their screening ordering rate for patients aged 45-49 years, indicating almost complete uptake of the recommendation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2024.10.003 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!