AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates how misinformation and disinformation hinder the use of scientific research in public policy decisions during disease outbreaks in West and Central Africa.
  • It employs a combination of scoping reviews and a two-stage DELPHI survey to gather insights from policymakers, practitioners, and citizens in Cameroon, Nigeria, and Senegal about the effects of mis/disinformation.
  • Findings reveal that online platforms are the primary sources of misinformation, significantly affecting health policy design and implementation, thereby highlighting the urgency of tackling evidence hesitancy among the public.

Article Abstract

Background: The 21st century has brought about a damaging information crisis, significantly challenging and undermining efforts to increase the uptake of scientific research evidence in both policy and practice. The World Health Organization (WHO) recognizes misinformation and disinformation as major drivers of pandemic spread and impact, dedicating a policy brief to pandemic preparedness on this issue. In this study, we examine the impact of mis/disinformation on the use of research evidence in public policy decision-making in West and Central Africa and reflect on how this can inform future pandemic preparedness.

Objectives: What factors affect the uptake of scientific evidence during disease outbreaks in Africa?

Methods: We used the JBI Scoping Review and Prevalence/Incidence Review methodologies to synthesize the best available evidence. A DELPHI survey was conducted in two stages: the first gathered experiences from policymakers, practitioners, and citizens in Cameroon, Nigeria, and Senegal regarding mis/disinformation and its impact. The second stage explored potential situations related to the issues identified in the first stage. Qualitative data analysis was conducted using MAXQDA.

Results: The research identified the origins ( = 5), transmission platforms ( = 15), cases ( = 4), mitigation strategies ( = 6), and impacts ( = 4) of infodemic on policy design, implementation, and uptake. Online platforms were identified as the main source of infodemic in 53.3% of cases, compared to 46.7% attributed to offline platforms. We conclude that the severity of COVID-19 as a global pandemic has highlighted the dangers of mis/disinformation, with a considerable number of studies from Middle Africa demonstrating a significant negative impact on the uptake of health policies and to an extend evidence informed policy making. It is also imperative to consider addressing evidence hesitancy in citizens through innovative and indigenous approaches like storytelling.

Discussions: Digital technologies, especially social media, play a key role in the propagation of infodemics. For future pandemic preparedness, stakeholders must consider using digital tools and platforms to prevent and mitigate pandemics. This study adds new evidence to the existing body of evidence, emphasizing the need to address infodemics within the context of future pandemic preparedness in Middle Africa.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11484489PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1275702DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pandemic preparedness
16
middle africa
12
future pandemic
12
uptake scientific
8
evidence
8
scientific evidence
8
pandemic
7
policy
5
addressing infodemic
4
infodemic pandemic
4

Similar Publications

Background: For a long time, the penalty of imprisonment has been studied and criticized as ineffective in achieving the goals of resocialization and rehabilitation of offenders, and studies have associated incarceration with increased prevalence of disease. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the World Health Organization recommended decarceration as a prevention measure. The aim of this review was to analyze the effectiveness of non-exposure to incarceration in preventing COVID-19 and mitigating associated events.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Retrospective modelling of the disease and mortality burden of the 1918-1920 influenza pandemic in Zurich, Switzerland.

Epidemics

January 2025

Institute of Evolutionary Medicine, University of Zurich, Switzerland; Swiss School of Public Health SSPH+, Zurich, Switzerland; Crisis Competence Center, University of Zurich, Switzerland. Electronic address:

Background: Our study aims to enhance future pandemic preparedness by integrating lessons from historical pandemics, focusing on the multidimensional analysis of past outbreaks. It addresses the gap in existing modelling studies by combining various pandemic parameters in a comprehensive setting. Using Zurich as a case study, we seek a deeper understanding of pandemic dynamics to inform future scenarios.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cholera outbreaks have been rapidly increasing around the world. While long-term cholera prevention and control measures rely on improvements in water, sanitation, and hygiene, oral cholera vaccines (OCVs) are used for prevention and control in the short-to-medium term. OCVs lack the market incentives available in other more profitable disease areas.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic exposed weaknesses in healthcare systems and disparities in healthcare access across sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). The insights of frontline healthcare professionals (HCPs), and healthcare researchers involved with the response to COVID in SSA are crucial to ensuring that health systems are optimally prepared for the next pandemic threat. Nonetheless, there is limited consensus as to what are the clinical and public health research priorities necessary to ensure that SSA is optimally prepared and responsive to future pandemics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!