AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study investigates the role of Asaia bacteria as potential symbionts for Aedes aegypti mosquitoes, focusing on their effects on larval development and symbiotic relationships.
  • - Experiments involved comparing mosquito larvae with both intact and aseptic microbiomes to determine the impact of three Asaia species, revealing that while Asaia can alter the gut microbiome, it is a transient presence that mainly affects the abundance of other bacteria.
  • - Findings indicated that Asaia bacteria have limited benefits for Aedes aegypti, showing species-specific positive effects on larval development primarily through interaction with other gut bacteria, rather than through direct mutualistic benefits.

Article Abstract

Aims: A wide range of vector control programmes rely on the efficient production and release of male mosquito. Asaia bacteria are described as potential symbionts of several mosquito species but their relationship with Aedes aegypti has never been rigorously tested. Here, we aimed to quantify the benefits of three Asaia species on host development in Ae. aegypti, and the ability of these bacteria to form a stable symbiotic association with growing larvae.

Methods And Results: In order to disentangle direct and indirect effects of Asaia inoculation on host development, experiments used insects with an intact microbiome and those reared in near-aseptic conditions, while we characterized bacterial communities and Asaia densities with culture dependent and independent methods (16S rRNA amplicon sequencing). Neonate larvae were inoculated with Asaia spp. for 24 h, or left as uninoculated controls, all were reared on sterile food. Aseptic larvae were produced by surface sterilization of eggs. Although all Asaia were transient members of the gut community, two species accelerated larval development relative to controls. The two mutualistic species had lasting impacts on the larval microbiome, largely by altering the relative abundance of dominant bacteria, namely Klebsiella and Pseudomonas. Axenic larvae were dominated by Asaia when inoculated with this species but showed slower development than conventionally reared insects, indicating that Asaia alone could not restore normal development.

Conclusions: Our results reveal Asaia as a poor mutualist for Ae. aegypti, but with a species-specific positive effect on improving host performance mediated by interactions with other bacteria.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jambio/lxae261DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

asaia
10
asaia spp
8
aedes aegypti
8
larval microbiome
8
host development
8
development
5
species
5
spp accelerate
4
accelerate development
4
development yellow
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!