AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study focused on understanding how working memory (WM) retrieval functions, differentiating between two types of recall: recollective (direct access) and non-recollective (reconstruction) processes, using the trichotomous theory of recall.
  • - Three experiments were conducted to examine how cognitive load (CL) and long-term memory (LTM) factors, such as associative relatedness and spaced presentation of items, influenced young adults' performance in a complex span task involving word lists.
  • - The results indicated that while both types of recall contribute to WM, recollective processes are more prevalent; increased CL negatively impacted direct access in recall, and different manipulations showed varying effects on the retrieval processes linked to L

Article Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the nature of the processes involved in working memory (WM) retrieval by distinguishing between recollective (direct access) and non-recollective (reconstruction) recall. To this end, the trichotomous theory of recall (Brainerd et al., 2009) was applied to young adults' recall performance in a complex span task in which word lists were presented in three successive study-test trials. In three experiments, factors known to affect WM performance were manipulated, such as the cognitive load (CL) of the concurrent task and the involvement of long-term memory (LTM) knowledge through the associative relatedness of the memory items and the temporally spaced presentation of memory lists. The application of the trichotomous theory of recall proved effective and established that both recollective and non-recollective processes support WM recall, though recollective processes are predominant. The detrimental effect of increased CL on recall performance appeared to result from a reduction in direct access, while leaving reconstruction unaffected. Two manipulations aimed at increasing the involvement of LTM in recall had different effects on retrieval processes. Associative relatedness favored direct access, while spaced presentation reduced it. The implications of these findings for our understanding of the relationships between LTM and WM and for WM theories are discussed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105978DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

direct access
12
recollective non-recollective
8
non-recollective processes
8
working memory
8
memory retrieval
8
trichotomous theory
8
theory recall
8
recall performance
8
associative relatedness
8
spaced presentation
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!