AI Article Synopsis
Article Abstract
This paper critically examines the validity of Freudian psychoanalysis within the framework of Moberger's characterisation of pseudoscience as bullshit with scientific pretensions. The central question addressed is whether Freudian psychoanalysis qualifies as "bullshit," following Moberger's guideline of looking for systematic fallacies. The analysis centres on two fundamental critiques against psychoanalysis: one posited by Popper, contending that psychoanalytic interpretation is excessively flexible, and another by Glymour, asserting that Freud's interpretative method baselessly posits associations as causes. This paper argues that both criticisms rest on misunderstandings and asserts that Freudian psychoanalysis does not commit the alleged fallacies. It also offers positive evidence that Freud was not a bullshitter. The conclusion drawn is that psychoanalysis should not be regarded as bullshit, and hence does not qualify as pseudoscience on Moberger's criteria. Consequently, the paper suggests that Freudian psychoanalysis deserves a fairer hearing then many have given it.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2024.09.003 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Continuing Revisions: Reconsidering Freud's Biography and Rethinking Our Thinking.
Psychoanal Rev
December 2024
P.O. Box 256, 22 Kimmel Lane, Jamesport, NY 11947, E-mail:
This reflection follows the work of a "Freud basher," Frederick Crews, elucidating some of Sigmund Freud's limitations and errors. It argues that a flawed Freud is preferable to the myth of a godlike genius and recommends ways in which to ground the future of psychoanalytic thinking.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOccasioned by the publication of , the text represents exchanges held in the summer of 2024 at the invitation of . It addresses the genesis and the history of the project, and its impact on psychoanalytic rethinking, formation, and practice. While exploring the potential and the limits of revisioning, it also raises questions about the nature of transmission of psychoanalytic knowledge and about the field's relation to the state of its own standards in the age of Anthropocene.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFContact barriers between Freud, Bion and Winnicott.
Am J Psychoanal
December 2024
, 1430, Redpath Crescent, Montreal (QC), H3G 1A2, Canada.
The author discusses the idea that psychoanalysts could benefit from a common paradigm, not necessarily a single theory, but a general frame through which to view their work. Focusing on perception as a basic modality of psychic life, in combination with the system-environment approach, could provide this common baseline. The text explores how this approach relates to the work of Freud, Bion, and Winnicott, emphasizing the interconnectedness of systems and their environments, the role of perception, and the concept of a contact barrier.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBion/Winnicott encounter: absence, failure and the negative in the work of Bion and Winnicott.
Am J Psychoanal
December 2024
, Brookline, MA 02446, USA.
After the death of Freud, a major thrust of the expansion of psychoanalytic theory involved the increasing recognition that the actuality of the emotional functioning of the object,-the primary objects in the infant's development, the analyst as object in the treatment process-were crucial determinants of developmental and therapeutic outcome. This recognition has been the driving force behind the evolution of various iterations of the role of interaction, inter-affectivity and intersubjectivity in two-person theories of psychic development and therapeutic action. This paper attempts to briefly trace in the work of Bion, Winnicott, Green and the Paris Psychosomatic School not only the effects of traumatic occurrences, but of their negative-i.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHistorical-critical meets : Common grounds, differences and interchange between Vienna and London.
Int J Psychoanal
October 2024
Psychoanalyst, training analyst and former president of the of the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society. General editor of the historical critical Sigmund Freud Edition.
After 30 years of collective effort and intensive discussion, Mark Solms and the Institute of Psychoanalysis in London have finally succeeded in completing all 24 volumes of the Revised Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (RSE). Within the framework of the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society, we have been working for 12 years on the primarily digital historical-critical (historisch-kritische) Sigmund Freud Edition (FE). The FE strives for completeness.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!