AI Article Synopsis

  • This research investigates how people's self-perceptions of agency and communion differ based on their socioeconomic status (SES), using data from 6 million individuals across 133 countries.
  • Higher SES individuals generally see themselves as more agentic and slightly less communal, but these perceptions vary significantly by country.
  • The study identifies three key national characteristics—religiosity, pathogen load, and income inequality—that influence these differences, suggesting they have important social implications.

Article Abstract

Do people of different socioeconomic status (SES) differ in how they see themselves on the Big Two self-concept dimensions of agency and communion? Existent research relevant to this theoretically and socially important question has generally been indirect: It has relied on distant proxies for agentic and communal self-concepts, narrow operationalizations of SES, comparatively small samples, and data from few nations/world regions. By contrast, the present research directly examines the associations between SES and agentic and communal self-concepts, relies on well-validated measures of agency and communion, examines three complementary measures of SES, and uses data from 6 million people (years of age: = 26.12, = 11.50) across 133 nations. Overall, people of higher status saw themselves as somewhat more agentic and as slightly less (or negligibly less) communal. Crucially, those associations varied considerably across nations. We sought to explain that variation with 11 national characteristics and found only three of them to be robustly relevant: National religiosity and pathogen load curbed status differences in agentic self-concepts, and income inequality amplified status differences in communal self-concepts. Our discussion develops theory to explain the importance of national religiosity, pathogen load, and income inequality for socioeconomic status differences in agentic and communal self-concepts and it also describes the substantial societal implications of those differences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000517DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

communal self-concepts
20
status differences
16
agentic communal
16
socioeconomic status
12
differences agentic
12
133 nations
8
nations people
8
national religiosity
8
religiosity pathogen
8
pathogen load
8

Similar Publications

The Self-Referent Encoding Task (SRET) can be used to measure self-concept via endorsement of trait words, a robust metric associated with depression severity. Our study is the first to investigate the structural validity and item functioning of SRET endorsement scores using confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. Community-dwelling preadolescent youth ( = 508;  = 12.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

How does living in an environment with many or few family relatives shape our psychology? Here, we draw upon ideas from behavioral ecology to explore the psychological effects of ecological relatedness-the prevalence of family relatives in one's environment. We present six studies, both correlational and experimental, that examine this. In general, people and populations that live in ecologies with more family relatives (Studies 1-4b), or who imagine themselves to be living in such ecologies (Studies 2/3a/3b/4b), engage in more extreme pro-group behavior (e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This research investigates how people's self-perceptions of agency and communion differ based on their socioeconomic status (SES), using data from 6 million individuals across 133 countries.
  • Higher SES individuals generally see themselves as more agentic and slightly less communal, but these perceptions vary significantly by country.
  • The study identifies three key national characteristics—religiosity, pathogen load, and income inequality—that influence these differences, suggesting they have important social implications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Autistic People's Experience of Empathy and the Autistic Empathy Deficit Narrative.

Autism Adulthood

September 2024

Department of Education, Childhood, and Inclusion, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Background: There is a dominant discourse, both in clinical texts and throughout the academic literature, that autistic people lack empathy; however, over the past decade, both clinicians and academics have increasingly rejected deficit-based descriptions of autism in favor of more nuanced explanations of the experience of autistic individuals in a social world.

Methods: This study asked 76 autistic individuals about their own experience of empathy and the oft-cited empathy deficit. Data were thematically analyzed and revealed a wide array of empathic self-concepts among respondents.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Prior studies have demonstrated the detrimental effects of social exclusion on an individual's self-perception. Nonetheless, existing literature has predominantly focused on its impact on global self-esteem, often neglecting the nuanced effects of various reasons for social exclusion on distinct dimensions of self-evaluation, such as agency and communion. Based on the Big Two model perspective, the present research aims to examine the differential impacts of social exclusion on the distinct dimensions of self-evaluation, namely agency and communion, considering the reasons for social exclusion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!