A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Fetal Surveillance in High-Risk Fetal Cardiac Disease: Frequency, Results and Relationship with Survival. | LitMetric

Fetal Surveillance in High-Risk Fetal Cardiac Disease: Frequency, Results and Relationship with Survival.

J Obstet Gynaecol Can

Fetal and Neonatal Cardiology Program, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, AB. Electronic address:

Published: December 2024

Objectives: We hypothesized that pregnancies with high-risk fetal heart disease (FHD) would benefit from frequent prenatal surveillance, abnormal fetal surveillance results would be associated with worse outcomes, and cardiovascular profile scoring (CVPS) could identify FHD cases at the highest risk of death.

Methods: A retrospective single-centre study of all actively treated pregnancies with high-risk FHD from 2006-2020. Frequency and results of fetal surveillance, survival, and mode of delivery were collected. Frequent fetal surveillance was defined as ≥ once weekly fetal well-being testing commencing by 28-32 weeks of gestation, or from later diagnosis, until delivery. Where possible, the CVPS was calculated.

Results: Fetal surveillance results were available in 92% (56/61) of pregnancies with high-risk FHD and were abnormal in 18% (10/56). A final CVPS of ≤7 carried a higher mortality (11/21, 52%) than ≥8 (6/31, 19% (P = 0.01)). There was a trend towards worse survival at the last follow-up when fetal surveillance was abnormal versus normal (40%, 4/10 vs. 72%, 33/46, P = 0.07). Survival did not differ between frequent versus infrequent surveillance (13%, 4/30 vs. 3%, 1/31, P = 0.20); nor when comparing abnormal versus normal surveillance results (20%, 2/10 vs. 7%, 3/46, P = 0.21). Where fetal surveillance was abnormal, emergency cesarean delivery was more common (70%, 7/10 vs. 4%, 2/46, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Abnormal fetal surveillance results and/or a CVPS ≤7 may identify compromised fetuses with high-risk FHD who could benefit from altered management or expedited delivery. Given the high rates of abnormal fetal surveillance in high-risk FHD, frequent fetal surveillance in the third trimester should be considered.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102690DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fetal surveillance
40
high-risk fhd
16
fetal
13
pregnancies high-risk
12
surveillance
12
surveillance abnormal
12
abnormal fetal
12
surveillance high-risk
8
high-risk fetal
8
fhd benefit
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!