Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objectives: We hypothesized that pregnancies with high-risk fetal heart disease (FHD) would benefit from frequent prenatal surveillance, abnormal fetal surveillance results would be associated with worse outcomes, and cardiovascular profile scoring (CVPS) could identify FHD cases at the highest risk of death.
Methods: A retrospective single-centre study of all actively treated pregnancies with high-risk FHD from 2006-2020. Frequency and results of fetal surveillance, survival, and mode of delivery were collected. Frequent fetal surveillance was defined as ≥ once weekly fetal well-being testing commencing by 28-32 weeks of gestation, or from later diagnosis, until delivery. Where possible, the CVPS was calculated.
Results: Fetal surveillance results were available in 92% (56/61) of pregnancies with high-risk FHD and were abnormal in 18% (10/56). A final CVPS of ≤7 carried a higher mortality (11/21, 52%) than ≥8 (6/31, 19% (P = 0.01)). There was a trend towards worse survival at the last follow-up when fetal surveillance was abnormal versus normal (40%, 4/10 vs. 72%, 33/46, P = 0.07). Survival did not differ between frequent versus infrequent surveillance (13%, 4/30 vs. 3%, 1/31, P = 0.20); nor when comparing abnormal versus normal surveillance results (20%, 2/10 vs. 7%, 3/46, P = 0.21). Where fetal surveillance was abnormal, emergency cesarean delivery was more common (70%, 7/10 vs. 4%, 2/46, P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Abnormal fetal surveillance results and/or a CVPS ≤7 may identify compromised fetuses with high-risk FHD who could benefit from altered management or expedited delivery. Given the high rates of abnormal fetal surveillance in high-risk FHD, frequent fetal surveillance in the third trimester should be considered.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102690 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!