Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background And Purpose: Learners face a variety of academic and personal challenges that may impact performance in Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) programs. Academic coaching has emerged as a student support model within undergraduate medical education but has not yet been evaluated in DPT education. The purpose of this method/model presentation was to describe the development, implementation, and evaluation of 2 coaching programs.
Method/model Description And Evaluation: Two hybrid DPT programs implemented a coaching approach to support students. The coaching framework was centered around an individualized relationship between the learner and faculty coach to promote reflection, growth, agency, and persistence in educational and professional development. Faculty members were prepared and supported to serve as coaches. Coaches met with their assigned students at regular intervals throughout the program, including clinical experiences. The coaching programs were assessed through program exit surveys and an alumni survey.
Outcomes: Graduates from both programs reported that the coaching program was effective and supported a sense of belonging or connectedness within their DPT program. They reported several specific activities that were part of the coaching program structure that supported its effectiveness, including group-based orientation activities and 1:1 meetings with their coach. Graduates also provided suggestions for program improvement including increased structure and more opportunities to connect with their peers and coaches in a nonacademic setting.
Discussion And Conclusion: Two DPT programs successfully implemented coaching as their student support model. With appropriate preparation, planning, and support, coaching programs have the potential to provide individualized and meaningful support for DPT students.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000378 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!