AI Article Synopsis

  • * Researchers used a smartphone-based virtual reality system to measure dynamic and static subjective visual vertical (SVV) among 40 older adults, assessing the reliability of these measurements through retests after one week.
  • * Results show that the dynamic SVV and visual dependency (VD) had good to excellent test-retest reliability, demonstrating that the smartphone VR method is a portable and effective tool for clinical applications in understanding balance issues in older adults.

Article Abstract

The perception of verticality is formed through the integration of multisensory gravitational information, including somatosensory, visual, and vestibular inputs. Older adults exhibit visual dependency (VD) as they rely more on visual information to compensate for reduced somatosensory and vertical perception. Increased VD is associated with falls, and the dynamic subjective visual vertical (SVV) is used to assess VD. However, the measurement reliability of dynamic SVV and VD using virtual reality (VR), which has garnered considerable attention in recent years, remains unclear. Therefore, our purpose in this study was to assess the test-retest reliability of dynamic SVVs and VDs using a VR method. We evaluated static and dynamic SVV of 40 older adults using a smartphone-based VR system (SVR-SVV). Dynamic SVV consisted of numerous spheres on the background rotating clockwise (CW-SVV) or counterclockwise (CCW-SVV). Each SVV measurement consisted of one set of 10 trials. VD was calculated as the mean value of dynamic SVV minus the mean values of static SVV. A re-test was conducted after one week. Reliability was analyzed using Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC 2, k) for each SVV measure. We observed no systematic bias in any of the SVV values, which were 0.1° ( = 2.8°), 13.3° ( = 8.3°), -12.8° ( = 6.9°), and 15.7° ( = 8.1°) for static SVV, CW-SVV, CCW-SVV, and VD, respectively. Test-retest reliability was good for static SVV (ICC = .817, < .001), CW-SVV (ICC = .896, < .001) and excellent for CCW-SVV (ICC = .914, < .001), VD (ICC = .937, < .001). The dynamic SVV and VD measurements using SVR-SVV demonstrated good test-retest reliability. Moreover, the SVR-SVV is more portable than conventional methods, making it highly useful in clinical practice.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00315125241292094DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dynamic svv
20
test-retest reliability
16
reliability dynamic
12
older adults
12
svv
12
static svv
12
dynamic
8
dynamic subjective
8
subjective visual
8
visual vertical
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!