The Effect of Image Count on Accuracy in Digital Measurements in Dentistry.

This study investigated how the number of images collected for digital measurements in dentistry affects accuracy compared with traditional methods. A Frasaco maxillary model was scanned using a SHINING 3D AutoScan-DS-MIX dental 3D scanner to create an STL file. The maxilla was molded 10 times using polyvinyl siloxane (Zhermack Elite HD+) to produce plaster models, which were scanned with the same reference scanner to generate 10 STL files. The Frasaco model was scanned 10 times, capturing images in intervals of 800-1000, 1000-1200, and 1200-1500 using a 3Shape TRIOS 3 intraoral scanner, creating additional STL files. These were analyzed with reverse engineering software. The most accurate measurements were obtained using 1200-1500 images. Conventional impression techniques performed significantly worse. There was a significant difference between the groups Digital 1200-1500 and Plaster ( < 0.001) and between Digital 800-1000 and Plaster ( = 0.007). No significant difference was found when the digital groups were compared among themselves. There was also no significant difference between the Plaster and Digital 1000-1200 groups. To compare precision values that were normally distributed across three or more methods, a one-way ANOVA was used. Trueness values that were not normally distributed with three or more methods were compared employing the Kruskal-Wallis test. Different image counts affect digital measurement accuracy. The most accurate measurements were obtained when collecting 1200-1500 images. Conventional impression techniques were shown to perform significantly worse than digital impression.