AI Article Synopsis

  • Proton therapy requires careful consideration when treating areas close to neural structures, and this study aims to compare dosimetric profiles of two techniques: intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for patients with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPCa).
  • Researchers generated treatment plans for 28 NPCa patients and conducted dosimetric comparisons, focusing on target coverage and doses to critical organs at risk (OARs), finding that IMPT had better dose spillage while HT was more beneficial for protecting the brainstem and optic structures.
  • The study identifies key criteria for selecting treatment methods, indicating that patients with larger tumors (cT4) or those with less than 0

Article Abstract

Background: Proton therapy requires caution when treating patients with targets near neural structures. Intuitive and quantitative guidelines are needed to support decision-making concerning the treatment modality. This study compared dosimetric profiles of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using helical tomotherapy (HT) for adaptive re-planning in cT3-4 nasopharyngeal cancer (NPCa) patients, aiming to establish criteria for selecting appropriate treatment modalities.

Methods: HT and IMPT plans were generated for 28 cT3-4 NPCa patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy. Dosimetric comparisons were performed for target coverage and high-priority organs at risk (OARs). The correlation between dosimetric parameters and RT modality selection was analyzed with the target OAR distances.

Results: Target coverages were similar, while IMPT achieved better dose spillage. HT was more favorable for brainstem D, optic chiasm D, optic nerves D, and p-cord D. IMPT showed advantages for oral cavity D. Actually, 14 IMPT and 14 HT plans were selected as adaptive plans, with IMPT allocated to most cT3 patients (92.9% vs. 42.9%, = 0.013). The shortest distances from the target to neural structures were negatively correlated with OAR doses. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were carried out to discover the optimal cut-off values of the shortest distances between the target and the OARs (temporal lobes and brainstem), which were 0.75 cm (AUC = 0.908, specificity = 1.00) and 0.85 cm (AUC = 0.857, specificity = 0.929), respectively.

Conclusions: NPCa patients with cT4 tumor or with the shortest distance between the target and critical neural structures < 0.8 cm were suboptimal candidates for IMPT adaptive re-planning. These criteria may improve resource utilization and clinical outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11476283PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers16193402DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

proton therapy
12
neural structures
12
npca patients
12
intensity-modulated proton
8
intensity-modulated radiation
8
radiation therapy
8
adaptive re-planning
8
impt plans
8
shortest distances
8
distances target
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!