Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
The feed consumption and feeding patterns of group-housed livestock and their productive outputs can be affected by interactions among group members, such as competition for feeder access and aggression. The impact of competition is especially significant when feed restriction is implemented during the fattening stage, a common practice in rabbit farms to reduce mortality from digestive disorders during this period. The overall aim was to quantify the importance of social interaction effects at the genetic and environmental level on feed efficiency, feeding behaviour and social ranking traits in rabbit populations having access to electronic feeders whilst they were housed in groups during fattening. This was done by quantifying novel feeding behaviour (FB) and social ranking (SR) traits and by estimating the genetic parameters and genetic correlations between all combinations of direct and social effects of these traits and residual feed intake (RFI), an indicator of feed efficiency. These effects were estimated in animals fed either ad libitum (AL) or on a time-based feed restriction (R) and were selected for feed efficiency on these feeding regimes for six generations. We found that there were substantial social genetic and social litter effects on RFI and FB traits, manifesting as antagonistic relationships between direct and social genetic effects. These effects were stronger amongst the R, as opposed to the AL animals. Despite these antagonistic relationships, the large social genetic effects resulted in substantial heritable variation available for selection of these traits, and therefore feeding behaviour could be changed by genetic selection, especially for R animals. The indicators of an animal's SR were also heritable and subject to social genetic effects and therefore may respond to selection. However, the phenotypic population mean would not change, because such traits are context-specific. The animals that took most of the feeding resources and had priority access to the feeder had a higher RFI, that is, they were less efficient, but they made their cage mates more efficient. This is the first time that the genetic correlations between direct effects of RFI and direct effects of FB and SR traits, as well as between social effects of RFI and direct effects of FB traits and SR traits, have been quantified. Results could help to understand the mechanisms by which an animal exerts its influence on the feed efficiency of its cage mates under different feeding regimes and assist in the development of breeding strategies.
