AI Article Synopsis

  • Patients who need oral anticoagulation and undergo coronary intervention can use a special stent (COBRA PzF) that may lower the need for long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) while maintaining safety against blood clots.
  • In a study, 996 patients were randomized to receive either the COBRA PzF stent with a short 14-day DAPT or a regular stent with longer DAPT durations of 3 to 6 months.
  • Results showed that the COBRA stent did not significantly reduce bleeding compared to the control group and was not proven to maintain equivalent safety for thromboembolic events, indicating further investigation is needed.

Article Abstract

Background: Patients with an indication for oral anticoagulation who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention require a combination of oral anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy. The use of a coronary stent with a thromboresistant and pro-healing coating may allow an abbreviated duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) without an increase in the risk of thromboembolic events.

Methods: Patients with an indication for oral anticoagulation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were randomized to treatment with the COBRA polyzene F (PzF) stent followed by 14 days of DAPT or a Food and Drug Administration-approved new-generation drug-eluting stent followed by 3 or 6 months of DAPT. The bleeding coprimary end point was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type ≥2 beyond 14 days (or after hospital discharge) until 6 months. The thromboembolic coprimary end point was the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, definite or probable stent thrombosis, or ischemic stroke at 6 months. The trial hypothesis was that the COBRA PzF stent strategy would be superior with respect to bleeding events and noninferior with respect to thromboembolic events.

Results: A total of 996 patients underwent randomization. The bleeding end point occurred in 37 of 475 patients (7.8%) in the COBRA PzF group and 47 of 482 patients (9.8%) in the control group (difference, -2.0 [95% CI, -5.6 to 1.6]; =0.14). The thromboembolic end point occurred in 37 of 492 patients (7.5%) in the COBRA PzF group and 24 of 490 patients (4.9%) in the control group (difference, 2.6%; prespecified noninferiority margin 5%, upper limit of 1-sided 95% CI of the difference, 5.2%; =0.07).

Conclusions: In patients with an indication for oral anticoagulation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, treatment with the COBRA PzF stent plus 14 days of DAPT was not superior with respect to bleeding events and was not noninferior with respect to thromboembolic events at 6 months compared with treatment with standard Food and Drug Administration-approved drug-eluting stent plus 3 to 6 months of DAPT.

Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02594501.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013735DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cobra pzf
20
oral anticoagulation
16
patients indication
12
indication oral
12
percutaneous coronary
12
coronary intervention
12
pzf stent
12
patients
8
antiplatelet therapy
8
anticoagulation undergoing
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!