Purpose: To explore the post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) of flywheel and traditional squats on a series of vertical jumps, the loads of the two protocols were matched based on their linear velocities. In addition, we attempted to validate the effectiveness of determining individualized recovery time (IRT) between conditioning activities and explosive movements.

Methods: Sixteen trained players participated in three main experiments: first, one-repetition maximum (1RM) assessment and intensity matching test; second, the weighted jump squat (WJS) test at baseline and at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 min after flywheel and traditional protocols; and third, squat jump (SJ), countermovement jump (CMJ), and approach jump (AJ) tests incorporating IRT determined in the WJS sessions into both protocols. These protocols were standardized to 8 repetitions at 80% 1RM with equivalent concentric speed matched by a linear position transducer and conducted in a random order on separate days.

Results: In the WJS tests, both protocols exhibited significant increases on jump height (JH), peak force (PF), and peak power (PP) after 2 to 6 min (all < 0.05), and the time courses of changes in performance were in a similar trend. In the SJ, CMJ, and AJ tests, both protocols demonstrated highly significant increases on JH, PP, and reactive strength index (RSI) after incorporating IRT (all < 0.01), with all participants exhibiting diverse improvement above the baseline levels. The potentiation percentages of the flywheel protocol on JH, PP, and RSI were higher than those of the traditional protocol across four jumping types (JH: 5.35%-9.79% vs. 4.13%-8.46%; PP: 4.16%-6.13% vs. 3.23%-4.77%; and RSI: 7.27% vs. 7.04%).

Conclusion: High-intensity flywheel squats can produce jumping potentiation in neuromechanical factors comparable to, or even surpassing, those observed in traditional squats, potentially making them a more effective option for inducing PAPE. Additionally, incorporating IRT into potentiation protocols could further optimize the PAPE effects.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11471904PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1443899DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

flywheel traditional
12
traditional squats
12
incorporating irt
12
post-activation performance
8
performance enhancement
8
individualized recovery
8
recovery time
8
tests protocols
8
protocols
7
jump
6

Similar Publications

Objective: This study compared the effects of Flywheel Resistance Squat Training (FRST) vs. Traditional Resistance Squat Training (TRST) on lower body strength in female collegiate basketball players.

Methods: Nineteen participants were randomly assigned to either the FRST group (n = 9) or the TRST group (n = 10) through a random number draw.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Inertial training, also called flywheel training is more and more popular among sportsmen. The available data concerning the effectiveness of inertial training compared to conventional resistance strength training are contradictory. The aim of this study was to compare the impact of inertial training (IT) vs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The purpose of this study was to examine the skeletal muscle hypertrophic, architectural, and performance-related adaptations in response to volume-matched, total-body flywheel versus traditional resistance training in a randomized, non-exercise controlled study in physically active young adults. Thirty-one healthy young adults (24 ± 3 y) were randomized to 10 weeks of traditional resistance training (TRT; n = 7F/5M), flywheel training (FWRT; n = 7F/4M), or a habitual activity control (CON; n = 5F/3M). Maximal voluntary isometric torque (MVIT), one repetition-maximum (1RM) for the free weight squat and bench press, three repetition work maximum (3W) for the flywheel squat and bench press, countermovement jump height, and broad jump distance, as well as site-specific muscle hypertrophy, fascicle length (FL), and pennation angle, were measured.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We evaluated the effects of post-activation performance enhancement through flywheel exercise with varying inertial loads compared to traditional resistance exercise on countermovement jump performance and muscle recruitment. In a randomized crossover design, 13 trained men completed four main experimental trials after three familiarization sessions. These conditions included a traditional trial consisting of 5 sets of 1 repetition using the Smith machine (SM) squat at 90% 1RM, and three flywheel ergometer trials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To explore the post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) of flywheel and traditional squats on a series of vertical jumps, the loads of the two protocols were matched based on their linear velocities. In addition, we attempted to validate the effectiveness of determining individualized recovery time (IRT) between conditioning activities and explosive movements.

Methods: Sixteen trained players participated in three main experiments: first, one-repetition maximum (1RM) assessment and intensity matching test; second, the weighted jump squat (WJS) test at baseline and at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 min after flywheel and traditional protocols; and third, squat jump (SJ), countermovement jump (CMJ), and approach jump (AJ) tests incorporating IRT determined in the WJS sessions into both protocols.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!