Return to play following craniotomy for non-traumatic brain lesions.

World Neurosurg X

Laboratory for Translational Neurosurgery Research, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ, UK.

Published: January 2025

Objective: Return to play (RTP) decisions after cranial surgery are important to patients. Most published data relate to RTP following sports-related brain injury. This study investigated factors that influence neurosurgical RTP decision-making following craniotomy for non-traumatic brain lesions.

Methods: A patient scenario-based survey was distributed to U.S. and Europe-based neurosurgeons via the American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons Tumor Section and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. From one core patient scenario, 5 further scenarios were developed involving patients of varying age, sport preference, tumor pathology, and craniotomy approach. Respondents provided RTP recommendations and factors important in forming these recommendations.

Results: Forty-one responses were received; Europe (48%), U.S. (37%). The most commonly cited factors influencing RTP decision-making across scenarios were symptomatic recovery (85.4%), resolution of blood and/or air on imaging (43.4%), and patient demand (31.7%). The sports with the longest average RTP timeline were boxing (10.3 months), rugby (8.7 months), and American football (8.5 months) in the core patient scenario. Twenty-nine percent of neurosurgeons requested neuroimaging before determining RTP recommendations in this scenario, more commonly in America than Europe (46.7% and 5.0% respectively,  = .006).

Conclusions: Although limited by sample size, the data provides a foundation to support development of a systematic approach to RTP decision-making following craniotomy for brain lesions of non-traumatic etiology. Future work to develop consensus guidelines will benefit from objective data about outcomes, particularly in relation to repeat imaging prior to RTP.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11471194PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100409DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rtp decision-making
12
rtp
9
return play
8
craniotomy non-traumatic
8
non-traumatic brain
8
brain lesions
8
decision-making craniotomy
8
core patient
8
patient scenario
8
rtp recommendations
8

Similar Publications

Objective: There is a paucity of high-quality return-to-play (RTP) data following treatment of cervical spine injuries in contact sports. In this study, the authors gathered insights from National Football League (NFL) team spine surgeon consultants to highlight current practices in treating cervical spine injuries and report decision-making regarding RTP in professional American football players.

Methods: A cross-sectional, online survey was distributed to all NFL consulting physicians specializing in the management of spine injuries.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Sports Medicine Physician Confidence in Concussion Assessments for Postconcussion Return-to-Play Decisions.

Clin J Sport Med

December 2024

Sanford Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

Objective: To identify sport-related concussion (SRC) assessments sports medicine physicians perform and in which they place confidence when making return-to-play (RTP) decisions.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Online survey.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A framework for categorizing sources of uncertainty in in silico toxicology methods: Considerations for chemical toxicity predictions.

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol

December 2024

Institute for Resources Environment, and Sustainability, The University of British Columbia, 2202 Main Mall, BC, V6T 1Z4, Vancouver, Canada.

Improving regulatory confidence and acceptance of in silico toxicology methods for chemical risk assessment requires assessment of associated uncertainties. Therefore, there is a need to identify and systematically categorize sources of uncertainty relevant to the methods and their predictions. In the present study, we analyzed studies that have characterized sources of uncertainty across commonly applied in silico toxicology methods.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

There is a pressing need to increase the efficiency and reliability of toxicological safety assessment for protecting human health and the environment. While conventional toxicology tests rely on measuring apical changes in vertebrate models, there is increasing interest in the use of molecular information from animal and in vitro studies to inform safety assessment. One promising and pragmatic application of molecular information involves the derivation of transcriptomic points of departure (tPODs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The Delphi technique is a structured, iterative group survey method utilized to reach a consensus among experts in a field regarding topics with evidence-based equipoise. Currently, there are few studies at the highest levels of evidence published on the perioperative tibial spine management, making it an ideal subject to utilize expert opinion to reach consensus decision.

Hypothesis/purpose: The purpose of this study was to utilize a Delphi-method survey to achieve consensus statements regarding the perioperative management of tibial spine fractures.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!