A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The Effect of the Adoption of the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer Process on Compliance Standards at a Single Institution. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer (NAPRC) aims to improve the quality of rectal cancer treatment in the U.S. by setting specific care standards.
  • A study at a tertiary care academic hospital reviewed 353 rectal cancer patients before and after NAPRC guidelines were adopted to assess compliance with these standards.
  • Results showed significantly higher compliance in pretreatment and postoperative care for patients diagnosed after the adoption of NAPRC, with nearly complete compliance achieved within two years.

Article Abstract

The National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer (NAPRC) was developed to enhance the quality of rectal cancer care in the United States. This project compared NAPRC compliance at a single tertiary care academic hospital before and after the institution adopted these standards in 2019. Rectal cancer patients from 2016 to 2023 who met NAPRC eligibility criteria were retrospectively reviewed for compliance with pre-selected patient care standards. Patients diagnosed prior to August 1, 2019 (pre-NAPRC) were compared with those diagnosed afterward (post-NAPRC) to determine whether compliance with these standards differed following the institution's adoption of new guidelines. This study included 353 patients, 146 pre-NAPRC and 207 post-NAPRC. The post-NAPRC group demonstrated significantly higher compliance with pretreatment standards compared to the pre-NAPRC group, including attaining magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) ( = .015), computed tomography (CT) ( < .001), and a carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level ( < .001). Postoperative standards were more frequently met in the post-NAPRC group regarding the photographing of surgical specimens ( < .001). No significant differences were observed in confirming a tissue diagnosis, starting treatment within a 60-day timeframe, or completing surgical pathology reports. Prior to initiation of the NAPRC process, the institution had achieved accreditation-level compliance in 2 of the 7 standards. Within 2 years of adopting NAPRC standards, complete compliance was met in 6 of the 7 measures. A single institution's adoption of NAPRC standards improved compliance with multiple rectal cancer care standards, achieving near-complete accreditation level compliance within 2 years.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00031348241292730DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rectal cancer
20
compliance standards
12
standards
10
compliance
9
national accreditation
8
accreditation program
8
program rectal
8
cancer care
8
care standards
8
institution's adoption
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!