Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
For ultrasound localization microscopy, the localization of microbubbles (MBs) is an essential part to obtain super-resolved maps of the vasculature. This paper analyzes the impact of image discretization and patch size on the precision of different MB localization methods to reconcile different observations from previous studies, provide an estimate of feasible localization precision, and derive guidelines for an optimal parameter selection. For this purpose, images of MBs were simulated with Gaussian point-spread functions (PSF) of varying width parameter σ at randomly generated subpixel positions, and Rician distributed noise was added. Four localization methods were tested on patches of different sizes (number of pixels N × N): Gaussian fit, radial symmetry method, calculation of center of mass, and peak detection. Additionally, the Cramér-Rao lower bound (CRLB) for the given estimation problem was calculated. Our results show that the localization precision is strongly influenced by the ratio of the PSF width parameter σ to the pixel size Δ, as well as the patch size N. The best parameter combination depends on the localization method. Generally, very small σ/Δ ratios as well as large σ/Δ ratios in combination with small N lead to performance degradation. The Gaussian fit as representative of a model-based fit comes close to the CRLB and always performs best for the σ/Δ ratios given by image discretization if N is adapted to the PSF. To achieve good results with the Gaussian fit and the radial symmetry method, a good rule of thumb is to set the pixel sizes Δ ≤ σ/0.6 and the patch sizes N ≥ 2σ/Δ + 3.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2024.3479710 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!