A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of Two-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography Between Two Different Instruments for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • This study aimed to compare 2D shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) measurements from two different devices and assess their effectiveness in diagnosing liver fibrosis among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and healthy volunteers.
  • A total of 290 HCC patients and 30 healthy volunteers participated, with notable differences in 2D-SWE results between the two devices, especially in patients with advanced liver fibrosis (stage F4).
  • Factors such as alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and the stage of liver fibrosis were identified as significant influences on the measurement results, highlighting variability in diagnosing severe liver conditions.

Article Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate and compare 2-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) measurements and influencing factors among 2 different devices and to evaluate the ability and influencing factors of these measurements to assess liver fibrosis.

Methods: From October 2022 to September 2023, 290 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and 30 healthy volunteers were prospectively included. The 2D-SWE measurements were performed using AixPlorer V (SEmean) and APLIO i900 (CEmean). This study compared 2D-SWE measurements between instruments for evaluating the liver fibrosis stage and analyzed the potential influencing factors.

Results: The 2D-SWE measurements obtained by the 2 instruments were significantly different (P < .001), but the differences were significant only for patients with stage F4 liver fibrosis (P < .001) and not for volunteers or patients with stage F0-F3 liver fibrosis (all P > .050). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that the factors independently influencing the SEmean were alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (P = .034) and liver fibrosis stage (P < .001), while fibrosis stage (P = .028) was the only factor influencing the CEmean.

Conclusions: Although 2D-SWE from the 2 different instruments was capable of detecting liver fibrosis, it yielded varying results in HCC patients. These discrepancies were predominantly observed in patients with F4 liver fibrosis but not in healthy adults or patients with F0-F3 liver fibrosis. One potential contributing factor to the differences between instruments could be ALT levels.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jum.16597DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

2d-swe measurements
16
shear wave
8
wave elastography
8
hepatocellular carcinoma
8
influencing factors
8
measurements instruments
8
measurements
5
comparison two-dimensional
4
two-dimensional shear
4
elastography instruments
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!