Background And Objectives: The RAPIDO trial showed promising rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant short-course radiation with consolidation chemotherapy (total neoadjuvant therapy [SC TNT]) for rectal cancer. Only single-center reviews comparing tumor downstaging between SC TNT and long-course chemoradiation (LCRT) have been published in the United States. We reviewed our multi-institutional experience with both.

Methods: The US Rectal Cancer Consortium database (2007-2018) including data from six high-volume rectal cancer care centers was reviewed. Patients with nonmetastatic, rectal adenocarcinoma who had neoadjuvant LCRT alone or SC TNT before excision or definitive nonoperative management were included. The primary outcome was the rate of complete response (CR), including pCR or durable (12 month) clinical complete response.

Results: Of 857 included patients, 175 (20%) received SC TNT and 682 (80%) received LCRT. The LCRT group had more low tumors (51.8% vs. 37.1%, p < 0.0001) and more clinically node-negative disease (31.8% vs. 22.3%, p < 0.0001). The CR rate was higher after SC TNT (34.1% vs. 20.3%, p = 0.0001). SC TNT was a predictor of CR (OR: 2.52, CI: 1.68-3.78). SC TNT patients completing 5-6 months of consolidation chemotherapy had a CR rate of 42.9%. There was no difference in 3-year PFS.

Conclusions: SC TNT increases CR rate when compared to LCRT. For patients seeking nonoperative options or fewer radiation treatments, SC TRT should be preferred over LCRT alone.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jso.27908DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rectal cancer
16
tumor downstaging
8
cancer consortium
8
complete response
8
rectal
6
short-course tnt
4
tnt improves
4
improves rectal
4
rectal tumor
4
downstaging retrospective
4

Similar Publications

Purpose: Endoscopic resection is appropriate for selected colorectal polyp cancers, but significant variation exists in treatment. This study aims to investigate variation in management of screen-detected polyp cancers (T1), factors predicting primary endoscopic polypectomy and threshold for subsequent surgical resection.

Method: Patients with polyp cancers (T1) diagnosed by the bowel cancer screening programme (BCSP) were investigated at two screening centres (5 individual sites and 4 MDTs, 2012-2022).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Rectal cancer is a prevalent disease that requires multidisciplinary management. Results of treatment of patients suffering from this malignancy in Latin America have been scarcely reported before.

Methods: A retrospective, multicenter study was conducted to report preoperative and operative characteristics of patients intervened for rectal cancer in centers from Latin America during 2015-2022, and the short-term results of treatment were analyzed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Comparison of short-term outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a propensity matched analysis].

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi

December 2024

Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Teaching Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Yangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Clinical Transformation of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases, Yangzhou225001, China.

To investigate the short-term efficacy of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of mid-low rectal cancer. This was a retrospective cohort study of clinical data of patients with mid-low rectal cancer (caudad edge of tumor less than 10 cm from the anal verge) treated with laparoscopic or robotic radical surgery in the Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University from July 2019 to November 2021. Patients whose anus had not been completely preserved, with malignant obstruction or perforation, with poor anal function indicated by preoperative low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) scores, or with incomplete follow-up information were excluded.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To assess urological complications in patients undergoing total pelvic exenteration (TPE) for locally advanced (LARC) and recurrent rectal cancer (RRC) as publications in this area are limited. Secondary objectives were to assess whether LARC vs RRC or radiation status affected urological outcomes.

Methods: Single-centre, retrospective study of TPE patients between January 2017 and December 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!