A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Effectiveness of bespoke or customised orthotic treatment in plantar pressure reduction of the central metatarsals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. | LitMetric

Background: Conservative treatment is the first therapeutical option for central heads metatarsalgia, a common foot condition. However, to our best knowledge, systematic review and meta-analysis of its effectiveness in terms of plantar pressure improvement have not been yet carried out. Our aim was to answer the following research question: Is bespoke or customized orthotic treatment effective for plantar pressure reduction in patients with mechanical metatarsalgia in the central metatarsal heads?

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of bespoke or customised orthotic treatment in terms of plantar pressure reduction beneath the central -2nd to 4th - metatarsal heads in mechanical metatarsalgia patients were carried out. Pubmed database was searched from September to November 2022. All type of related-topic studies were included. Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to assess the risk of bias of each study. Descriptive and frequency analyses were performed with SPSS 25.0 software. Review Manager v5.4.1 software was used to analyse the data using the inverse variance method for continuous outcomes according to a fixed or random effects model.

Results: A total of 5 studies met our inclusion criteria, with 158 participants. Bespoke or customised orthotic treatment is effective for the improvement of plantar pressure under 2nd to 4th metatarsal heads in mechanical metatarsalgia patients (MD -37.54 [95 % CI -65.84, -9.24], p = 0.009). Customised orthotic treatment is more effective than no treatment in terms of reducing plantar pressure (MD -78.63 [95 % CI -119.70, -39.16], p = 0.0002), but its effectiveness is similar to standardised footwear, standardised foot orthoses and isolated metatarsal domes.

Conclusions: We found conservative bespoke or customised orthotic treatment to be effective for the improvement of plantar pressure under the central metatarsal heads.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11466557PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2023.12.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

plantar pressure
28
orthotic treatment
24
customised orthotic
20
bespoke customised
16
treatment effective
16
pressure reduction
12
systematic review
12
review meta-analysis
12
mechanical metatarsalgia
12
metatarsal heads
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!