AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compared the effectiveness of two surgical techniques (outside-in vs. all-inside suturing) for treating discoid lateral meniscus injuries, involving 30 patients in each group.
  • Results showed that the all-inside suturing group had better clinical outcomes, including shorter operation times and lower pain scores post-surgery.
  • Factors influencing treatment success included operation duration, knee scores at six months, and the type of suturing method used.

Article Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of arthroscopic outside-in suturing and all-inside suturing in the treatment of discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) injury, and to analyze the influencing factors for clinical efficacy.

Methods: We retrospectively selected 30 patients with DLM injury who received arthroscopic all-inside suturing at Wuzhou Workers' Hospital from January 2020 to December 2022 as the observation group. Another 30 patients who received arthroscopic outside-in suturing during the same period were enrolled as the control group. The surgical indicators, pre- and post-operative knee scores and proprioception difference of knee joint, postoperative complications and clinical efficacy were compared between the two groups. Factors affecting clinical efficacy of patients with DLM injury were identified using Logistic regression analysis.

Results: Significant differences were observed in operation time, hospital stay, blood loss and clinical efficacy between the two groups (all <0.05); however, there was no significant difference in complications (>0.05). The visual analog score (VAS) scores of both groups decreased over time at 1, 3, 5, 7, 15, and 30 days post-surgery, with the observation group scoring lower than the control group (all <0.05). At 1, 3, and 6 months after the surgery, the international knee documentation committee (IKDC), Lysholm, and Tegner scores of both groups increased over time, with the observation group scoring higher than the control group (all <0.05). Six months post-surgery, proprioception differences at 15°, 45°, and 75° of knee flexion were significantly decreased, with greater improvements observed in the observation group (<0.05). Univariate analysis showed that operation time, IKDC and Lysholm scores at 6 months post-operation, postoperative complications, and suture method were factors influencing treatment outcomes in patients with DLM injury (all <0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis identified postoperative complications as an independent risk factor for poor treatment outcome in patients with DLM injury (<0.05).

Conclusion: Arthroscopic all-inside suturing for DLM injury offers significant clinical benefits, including shorter operation time and hospital stay, less blood loss, and improved knee joint function with fewer complications. Prolonged operation time, low IKDC and Lysholm scores at 6 months post-operation, postoperative complications and outside-in suturing technique are associated with poorer treatment outcomes in patients with DLM injury.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11470300PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.62347/XCXD7782DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical efficacy
16
arthroscopic outside-in
12
dlm injury
12
knee joint
8
outside-in suturing
8
all-inside suturing
8
factors clinical
8
patients dlm
8
received arthroscopic
8
observation group
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!