AI Article Synopsis

  • A multi-center randomized clinical trial compared the effectiveness of guided bone regeneration (GBR) using DBBM and NBCM against open flap debridement (OFD) for treating peri-implantitis-related bony defects over 36 months.
  • The study involved 66 patients, with 34 in the GBR group receiving graft materials and 32 in the OFD control group receiving only standard decontamination treatment.
  • At the end of the trial, GBR showed a trend towards better defect fill and higher treatment success rates, achieving 46.2% success compared to 20% for OFD, although these differences were not statistically significant.

Article Abstract

Design: This multi-center, randomized clinical trial compared the long-term outcomes of guided bone regeneration (GBR) with open flap debridement (OFD) in treating peri-implantitis-related bony defects with ≥3 osseous walls over 36 months. The study aimed to evaluate the healing potential of GBR using a deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) graft and native bilayer collagen membrane (NBCM) compared to OFD without the use of graft materials.

Case Selection: Sixty-six individuals diagnosed with peri-implantitis were randomly assigned to either GBR (34 patients) or OFD (32 patients). The OFD group served as the control, where inflamed tissue was removed and the implant surface decontaminated using 3% hydrogen peroxide, but no bone graft was placed. The GBR group received DBBM and NBCM for defect reconstruction. Radiographic defect fill (RDF), probing pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP), suppuration (SUP), mucosal recession (MREC), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed over the study duration. Post-surgical care included azithromycin, ibuprofen, and chlorhexidine rinses.

Study Timeline: The study involved baseline assessments, surgical interventions, and follow-ups at 6, 12, and 36 months. Supportive peri-implant therapy was provided every 3 months during the additional 24-month follow-up.

Data Analysis: Primary outcome was RDF at 36 months. Secondary outcomes included PPD, BOP, SUP, MREC, and PROs. Descriptive statistics and ANCOVA models were used for analysis.

Results: At 36 months, GBR resulted in a mean RDF of 2.13  ±  1.26 mm, compared to 1.64  ±  1.54 mm with OFD (p  =  .18). No significant differences were found in PPD, BOP, SUP, REC, or PROs between the groups. Treatment success (defined as no additional bone loss, PPD ≤ 5 mm, no BOP, and no SUP) was achieved in 46.2% of GBR cases and 20% of OFD cases (p = 0.053).

Conclusions: GBR provided improved short-term defect fill and higher treatment success compared to OFD, although the differences were not statistically significant. Both procedures maintained clinical parameters over 36 months, with similar patient satisfaction (PROs) observed for GBR and OFD. The adjunct use of DBBM and NBCM may offer clinical benefits for peri-implantitis cases with specific bony defect morphology.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01073-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

defect fill
12
guided bone
8
bone regeneration
8
gbr
8
ofd
8
compared ofd
8
patients ofd
8
dbbm nbcm
8
ppd bop
8
treatment success
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!