AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study evaluates the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) and its effectiveness in predicting outcomes like care consumption, frailty issues, and mortality among older cancer patients, compared to the Geriatric 8 (G8) screening tool.
  • - Data was collected from 587 patients aged 70 and older with solid tumors in a hospital setting, focusing on various health aspects including cognitive function, nutrition, and mobility, using regression analyses to draw associations between HFRS, G8, and various health outcomes.
  • - Results indicated that while HFRS was linked to several health impairments and short-term care metrics, it failed to effectively identify issues related to polypharmacy, nutrition, and mood, showcasing

Article Abstract

Background: Automated frailty screening tools like the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) are primarily validated for care consumption outcomes. We assessed the predictive ability of the HFRS regarding care consumption outcomes, frailty domain impairments and mortality among older adults with cancer, using the Geriatric 8 (G8) screening tool as a clinical benchmark.

Methods: This retrospective, linkage-based study included patients aged ≥70 years with solid tumor, enrolled in the Elderly Cancer Patients (ELCAPA) multicentre cohort study (2016-2020) and hospitalized in acute care within the Greater Paris University Hospitals. HFRS scores, which encompass hospital-acquired problems and frailty-related syndromes, were calculated using data from the index admission and the preceding 6 months. A multidomain geriatric assessment (GA), including cognition, nutrition, mood, functional status, mobility, comorbidities, polypharmacy, incontinence, and social environment, was conducted at ELCAPA inclusion, with computation of the G8 score. Logistic and Cox regressions measured associations between the G8, HFRS, altered GA domains, length of stay exceeding 10 days, 30-day readmission, and mortality.

Results: Among 587 patients included (median age 82 years, metastatic cancer 47.0%), 237 (40.4%) were at increased frailty risk by the HFRS (HFRS>5) and 261 (47.5%) by the G8 (G8≤10). Both HFRS and G8 were significantly associated with cognitive and functional impairments, incontinence, comorbidities, prolonged length of stay, and 30-day mortality. The G8 was associated with polypharmacy, nutritional and mood impairment.

Discussion: Although showing significant associations with short-term care consumption, the HFRS could not identify polypharmacy, nutritional, mood and social environment impairments and showed low discriminatory ability across all GA domains.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae222DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

frailty risk
12
care consumption
12
frailty domain
8
domain impairments
8
impairments mortality
8
hospital frailty
8
risk score
8
older adults
8
adults cancer
8
cohort study
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!