AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates racial and ethnic disparities in the use of forearm arteriovenous access (AVA) for hemodialysis initiation, finding that Black and Hispanic patients are less likely to have forearm AVAs compared to White patients.
  • A retrospective analysis of over 70,000 patients from DaVita Kidney Care revealed a significant decline in the proportion of forearm AVA use, dropping from 49% in 2006 to 29% in 2019, without any differences in this trend among racial and ethnic groups.
  • The results highlight persistent inequalities in AVA location choices among different races, suggesting a need for further research into the underlying factors contributing to these differences.

Article Abstract

Rationale & Objective: Race and ethnicity differences exist in the type of arteriovenous access (AVA, including fistulas and grafts) used at hemodialysis (HD) initiation. The preferred anatomic location for the creation of an initial HD AVA is typically in the forearm We evaluated race and ethnicity differences in the use of an AVA in the forearm location at HD initiation.

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting & Participants: Using records from DaVita Kidney Care linked to the US Renal Data System (USRDS), we evaluated patients aged≥16 years who initiated in-center HD with an AVA between 2006 and 2019.

Predictor: Race and ethnicity, categorized as non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, or Other.

Outcome: Forearm versus upper arm AVA location.

Analytical Approach: Multivariable modified Poisson regression to estimate adjusted trends in AVA location over time and race and ethnicity differences in AVA location. Nested models helped assess the relative confounding by groups of variables on estimates of race and ethnicity differences.

Results: Among 70,147 patients (51.7% White, 28.8% Black, 12.6% Hispanic, 6.9% Other), White patients were older and more likely to have peripheral vascular disease but less likely to have diabetes compared with the other groups. The proportion initiating HD using a forearm AVA decreased from 49% in 2006 to 29% in 2019 and by 3.6% (95% CI, 3.3%-3.9%) annually, with no difference in this trend among groups (race and ethnicity by calendar year interaction P=0.32). Black patients were 13% (95% CI, 10%-15%) less likely and Hispanic patients were 5% (95% CI, 1%-9%) less likely than White patients to initiate HD with a forearm AVA.

Limitations: Findings may not apply to home HD.

Conclusions: Use of a forearm AVA for HD initiation has declined and racial differences have persisted, with Black and Hispanic patients being less likely than White patients to have an AVA in the forearm location. Research toward understanding the causes and consequences of these trends and disparities is warranted.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.07.017DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

race ethnicity
24
ethnicity differences
12
white patients
12
ava
10
forearm
8
forearm versus
8
versus upper
8
upper arm
8
arteriovenous access
8
hemodialysis initiation
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!