Application of the Medical Research Council guidance for complex interventions in the development of VIeSA, an intervention to support healthy ageing among community-dwelling older adults.

Background: The ageing population, coupled with the desire to age-in-place, highlight the need for programs that target health promotion as a means of maintaining functional ability, autonomy, and independence among community-dwelling older adults. This paper describes the development of the VIeSA intervention, which aimed to model a healthy ageing trajectory, including the identification of the necessary tools and methods, that would allow people older people, in partnership with health and social care professionals, to define personal health-related goals and the actions to achieve them. A key element of the intervention development was the creation of a support tool intended to assist this process.

Methods: The UK Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance on developing and evaluating complex interventions was applied in the development of the intervention and of the support tool. A participatory approach was selected, with stakeholders engaged on different occasions to allow the refinement of the intervention and of the support tool. Following the steps and suggested actions in the MRC development phase, the development process was conducted by identifying (1) the evidence base and (2) the theoretical framework and (3) by modelling the process and outcomes of the intervention.

Results: Following a literature review on effective interventions for functional ability, draft 1 of the support tool was designed. Focus groups with stakeholders provided feedback on this draft allowing for its refinement in terms of content, language use, and structure (draft 2). A review of the approaches for health promotion delivery led to further additions to the tool (draft 3) and informed the content of the training of health and social care professionals. After their training, professionals provided feedback on the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of different elements of the intervention. Results suggested that no further major refinement to the intervention or support tool was necessary.

Conclusions: The design and development of the VIeSA intervention using the MRC guidance allowed for a clarity of direction, an optimised content in terms of usefulness and accessibility for all concerned stakeholders, and greater opportunities for its implementation and uptake.