Neuroprotective agents ineffective in mitigating autonomic dysreflexia following experimental spinal cord injury.

Exp Neurol

International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, Canada. Electronic address:

Published: December 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the cardiovascular dysfunction caused by spinal cord injury (SCI) and assesses the efficacy of four neuroprotective agents in aiding cardiovascular recovery.
  • Male Wistar rats were given spinal contusions and treated with Fluoxetine, Glyburide, Valproic acid, and Indomethacin, with outcomes measured through blood pressure changes, locomotor function, and lesion area.
  • The results showed that Indomethacin and Valproic acid led to high mortality rates, while Fluoxetine and Glyburide were tolerated, but none of the treatments significantly improved blood pressure control or locomotor function compared to the control group.

Article Abstract

Background And Objectives: Loss of supraspinal cardiovascular control and secondary damage following spinal cord injury (SCI) lead to cardiovascular dysfunction, where autonomic dysreflexia (AD), triggered by stimuli below the injury, can cause uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) surges, posing severe health risks such as stroke and seizures. While anti-inflammatory neuroprotective agents have been studied for motor recovery, their impact on cardiovascular function remains under investigated. The objective was to assess the efficacy of four clinically approved neuroprotective agents in promoting cardiovascular recovery following SCI.

Methods: Male Wistar rats received contusion at the third thoracic spinal segment (T3). Fluoxetine, Glyburide, Valproic acid, and Indomethacin were first administered at 1 h or 6 h post-SCI, and every 12 h for two weeks thereafter. Four weeks following SCI, hemodynamics were measured at rest and during colorectal distension. Locomotor function was assessed prior to SCI and weekly for four weeks after SCI, using the Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan (BBB) locomotor scale. Quantitative comparisons of lesion area were performed.

Results: Contrary to the published literature, Indomethacin and Valproic acid resulted in high morbidity and mortality rates 60 % and 40 % respectively) within 2-3 days of administration. Fluoxetine, and Glyburide were well-tolerated. There were no differences in change in systolic BP with colorectal distension compared to control i.e., all experimental groups experienced severe episodes of AD [F(6, 67) = 0.94, p = 0.47]. There was no significant difference in BBB scores in any experimental group compared to control [F(18, 252) = 0.3, p = 0.99]. No between-group differences were observed in tissue sparing at the lesion epicentre [F(6, 422) = 6.98, p = 0.29].

Discussion: Despite promising beneficial effect reported in previous studies, none of the drugs demonstrated improvement in cardiovascular or motor function. Indomethacin and Valproic acid exhibited unexpected high mortality at doses deemed safe in the literature. This emphasizes the necessity for reproducibility studies in pre-clinical research and underscores the importance of publishing null findings to guide future investigations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2024.114993DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

neuroprotective agents
12
valproic acid
12
autonomic dysreflexia
8
spinal cord
8
cord injury
8
fluoxetine glyburide
8
weeks sci
8
colorectal distension
8
indomethacin valproic
8
compared control
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!