AI Article Synopsis

  • This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of two treatments, tenecteplase and alteplase, for patients with acute ischemic stroke, focusing on those with diabetes and high blood sugar at admission.
  • It analyzed data from 1382 participants in China, finding no significant differences in functional outcomes or risks of bleeding between the two treatments for both diabetic and non-diabetic patients.
  • The results suggest that tenecteplase is as safe and effective as alteplase for stroke treatment, regardless of a patient's glucose levels.

Article Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase versus alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke, considering their diabetes history and admission hyperglycemia status.

Methods And Results: This was a post hoc analysis of the TRACE-2 (Tenecteplase Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Ischemic Cerebrovascular Events-2) randomized clinical trial that enrolled patients in China between June 2021 and May 2022. Eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke for standard intravenous thrombolysis, but ineligible for endovascular thrombectomy, were randomly assigned (1:1) to tenecteplase or alteplase within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. Admission hyperglycemia was defined as plasma glucose >7.8 mmol/L. The primary efficacy and safety outcome were excellent functional outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours, respectively. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used for the outcomes. Of the 1382 patients included, 369 (26.7%) had a history of diabetes, and 482 (34.9%) experienced admission hyperglycemia. The primary efficacy outcome, comparing tenecteplase to alteplase, was achieved in 93 (56.7%) versus 97 (48.3%) among patients with a history of diabetes (=0.11) and 335 (64.6%) versus 300 (62.2%) among those without diabetes (=0.45), respectively. The primary efficacy outcome for tenecteplase versus alteplase was comparable among patients with and without admission hyperglycemia (57.5% versus 53.9%,  = 0.44; 65.4% versus 60.4%, =0.12, respectively). No significant difference in the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours was observed between tenecteplase and alteplase, regardless of diabetes history or admission hyperglycemia.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that intravenous tenecteplase exhibits similar clinical outcomes compared with alteplase, irrespective of the patient's glucose metabolism status.

Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04797013.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.036393DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

admission hyperglycemia
20
acute ischemic
16
efficacy safety
12
tenecteplase versus
12
versus alteplase
12
ischemic stroke
12
tenecteplase alteplase
12
primary efficacy
12
tenecteplase
8
intravenous tenecteplase
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!