Objective: Findings from adult studies suggest that tronco-conical cuffs provide more accurate blood pressure (BP) measurements in individuals with obesity. The aim of the present study was to examine differences in office blood pressure (BP) levels using conical cuffs compared to standard-shaped cylindrical cuffs in children and adolescents with obesity.
Design And Method: We performed an observational study, including 37 children and adolescents with obesity, who were consequently recruited from the outpatient clinics of the Obesity and Cardiovascular Risk Unit at General University Hospital Consortium of Valencia. Arm circumference AC was measured in all participants, and the appropriate cuff size was selected for both conical and cylindrical cuffs.
Results: Mean participants' age was 11.82.5 years, mean BMI was 28.83.4 kg/m, mean BMI z-score was 2.120.32, and mean AC was 30.03.6 cm. There was no statistical significance in BP levels measured by cylindrical compared to conical cuffs (mean difference cylindrical-conical cuff was -0.226.55 mmHg for SBP, -0.020.81 for SBP z-score, -0.704.95 mmHg for DBP, and -0.060.44 for DBP z-score). A significant positive association was found between the measurements obtained by cylindrical and conical cuffs in both mean and z-score SBP and DBP values ( < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed good agreement, with 94.6% of the values for all BP parameters lying between the limits of agreement.
Conclusions: Although the use of conical cuffs in the study showed no advantage in enhancing the performance of BP measurements, they may be considered an alternative for office BP measurements in children and adolescents with obesity. Their reliability should be confirmed in larger populations and different settings.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2024.2411294 | DOI Listing |
Blood Press
December 2024
1st Department of Pediatrics, Hippocratio General Hospital, Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue
January 2024
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China. Corresponding author: Huang Ling, Email:
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of cylindrical-shaped and conical-shaped cuff catheters for airway closure using different pressure measurement methods at the lowest safe pressure and to guide the clinical application.
Methods: Twenty-four patients with endotracheal intubation admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital from December 2021 to January 2022 were enrolled. Leakage test in vitro was performed on the secretion on the patients' cuff.
Blood Press Monit
February 2023
Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Objective: Recommendations about the dimensions of the reference cuff for device validations in people with arm size >42 cm are still unavailable. The aim of this study was to identify the criteria for an appropriate reference cuff for validation studies in people with upper arm circumference between 43 and 50 cm.
Methods: In 20 adults with upper arm circumference between 43 and 50 cm (X-large group), 34 subjects with arm circumference between 37 and 42 cm and 78 subjects with arm circumference <37 cm cylindrical and tronco-conical cuffs were compared.
Am J Hypertens
June 2022
Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Background: Published evidence has shown that troncoconical cuffs improve blood pressure measurement accuracy in subjects with obesity. However, the exact shape of these cuffs according to arm size is unknown. The aim of the present study was to investigate the anthropometric characteristics of the arm in a large population in order to identify the appropriate shape of the cuff for each arm.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Anesthesiol
August 2020
Department of Women's Anesthesia, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, 229899, Singapore.
Background: Accurate blood pressure (BP) measurement depends on appropriate cuff size and shape in relation to the arm. Arm dimensions outside the recommended range of cuff sizes or trunco-conical arms may result in inaccurate BP measurements. Measuring BP using finger cuffs is a potential solution.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!