AI Article Synopsis

  • - Understanding the S-layer anchoring in bacteria involves non-covalent interactions between S-layer domains and secondary cell wall polymers (SCWPs), with specific roles for ManNAc ligands and the MnaA enzyme in SCWP biosynthesis.
  • - Research focused on producing MnaA and its variants to analyze their kinetic properties, test allosteric activation by UDP-GlcNAc, and explore the effects of tunicamycin as a potential inhibitor using crystal structure analysis and molecular docking.
  • - The study revealed the crystal structure of MnaA and confirmed the conservation of key residues, finding that UDP-GlcNAc boosts reaction rates but isn't essential for its function, while tunicamycin doesn't

Article Abstract

Introduction: S-layer anchoring in is enabled by a non-covalent interaction between an S-layer homology domain trimer and a secondary cell wall polymer (SCWP), ensuring the structural integrity of the bacterial cell wall. Within the SCWP repeat, pyruvylated ManNAc serves as the ligand and the UDP-GlcNAc-2-epimerase MnaA supplies UDP-ManNAc to SCWP biosynthesis.

Methods: To better understand SCWP biosynthesis and identify strategies for inhibiting pathogens with comparable cell wall architecture, like , MnaA and rational variants were produced in and their kinetic constants determined. The effect of UDP-GlcNAc as a predicted allosteric activator and tunicamycin as a potential inhibitor of MnaA was tested supported by molecular docking experiments. Additionally, wild-type MnaA was crystallized.

Results: We present the crystal structure of unliganded MnaA resolved at 2.20 Å. It adopts a GT-B fold consistent with other bacterial non-hydrolyzing UDP-GlcNAc 2-epimerases. A comparison of amino acid sequences reveals conservation of putative and known catalytic and allosteric-site residues in MnaA, which was confirmed through analysis of Q42A, Q69A, E135A and H241A MnaA variants. The kinetic parameters and of MnaA were determined to be 3.91 mM and 33.44 s for the forward, and 2.41 mM and 6.02 s for the reverse reaction. While allosteric regulation by UDP-GlcNAc has been proposed as a mechanism for enzyme activation, UDP-GlcNAc was not found to be essential for UDP-ManNAc epimerization by MnaA. However, the reaction rate doubled upon addition of 5% UDP-GlcNAc. Unexpectedly, the UDP-GlcNAc analog tunicamycin did not inhibit MnaA. Molecular docking experiments comparing tunicamycin binding of MnaA and MnaA, which is inhibited by tunicamycin, revealed different residues exposed to the antibiotic excluding, those at the predicted allosteric site of MnaA, corroborating tunicamycin resistance.

Conclusion: The unliganded crystal structure of MnaA reveals an open conformation characterized by an accessible cleft between the N- and C-terminal domains. Despite the conservation of residues involved in binding the allosteric activator UDP-GlcNAc, the enzyme is not strictly regulated by the substrate. Unlike MnaA, the activity of MnaA remains unaffected by tunicamycin.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11464976PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2024.1470989DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cell wall
16
mnaa
16
udp-glcnac
8
secondary cell
8
wall polymer
8
predicted allosteric
8
allosteric activator
8
molecular docking
8
docking experiments
8
crystal structure
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!