AI Article Synopsis

  • Proper patient positioning and operating table height are crucial for minimizing strain on anesthesiologists during procedures like mask ventilation and intubation.
  • A study with 180 patients analyzed how different table heights affected anesthesiologists' discomfort and the quality of intubation, using established grading systems for laryngoscopic views and discomfort levels.
  • Results showed that the lowest table height (group 3) required more postural adjustments, and many anesthesiologists reported moderate discomfort at that height, suggesting that higher table positions are more ergonomic.

Article Abstract

Background And Aims: Optimal patient positioning and operating table height are essential for an ergonomic posture of an anesthesiologist in which there is minimal or no strain on thewrist during mask ventilation. It also avoids flexion of the neck, lower back, and knee bending at the time of laryngoscopy and intubation.

Material And Methods: One hundred eighty patients were randomly allocated to three groups based on different table heights. The height of the table is kept at the mid-sternum level of an anesthesiologist in group 1, at the xiphoid process in group 2, and at the level of umbilicus in group 3. Laryngoscopic view with or without postural changes (exertion at wrist joint, flexion of the neck, lower back, or knee bending) was graded as per Cormack Lehane's (CL) grading. The degree of discomfort experienced by the anesthesiologist during mask ventilation or tracheal intubation was graded subjectively (1 = no discomfort, 2 = mild discomfort, 3 = moderate discomfort, and 4 = severe discomfort) at different table heights. Postural changes required to obtain the best glottic view and quality of endotracheal (ET) intubation (intubation time and attempts required) were also noted. For analysis, quantitative variables were expressed as mean ± SD and compared using unpaired or analysis of variance test. Qualitative variables were expressed as frequencies/percentages and compared using the Chi-square test. Results with value <0.05 were considered significant statistically.

Results: Moderate discomfort (strain at wrist joint) during bag-mask ventilation was experienced by the anesthesiologist in a maximum number of patients in group 1 (81.7%). Significant improvement was seen in CL grade after the use of postural modifications in groups 1 and 2 ( value ≤0.05). Greater postural modifications were required during ET intubation at lower table heights (group 3).

Conclusions: It is advisable to adopt higher table positioning in relation to anesthesiologist performing the laryngoscopy for smooth and single-attempt ET intubation since the best laryngoscopic view and intubation with minimal postural modifications was seen at higher table heights (at the mid-sternum level of an anesthesiologist).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11463936PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_443_22DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mask ventilation
12
table height
8
endotracheal intubation
8
flexion neck
8
neck lower
8
lower knee
8
knee bending
8
table heights
8
postural changes
8
variables expressed
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!