AI Article Synopsis

  • The study analyzed the use of physical restraints among hospitalized adults in a healthcare network, identifying that 6.3% of hospitalizations involved restraint use, particularly higher in intensive care units (39% of ICU cases).
  • Factors like age, male gender, and language barriers were linked to higher likelihoods of restraint use.
  • The ICD-10 code for physical restraint was found to have very low sensitivity (1.5%) but extremely high specificity (99.99%) when compared to electronic health record documentation, indicating a major gap in accurately capturing restraint use.

Article Abstract

Background: The use of restraints in hospitalized patients is associated with physical and psychological adversity for patients and staff. The minimization of restraint use is a key goal in the hospital setting. Reaching this goal requires an accurate assessment of existing patterns of use across clinical settings.

Objective: This study reports the rate of physical restraints among patients hospitalized within a multi-entity healthcare network along with stratification by care context, diagnostic, and demographic factors, and examines the sensitivity and specificity of ICD-10 code Z78.1 "physical restraint status" for defining physical restraints relative to electronic health record (EHR) documentation.

Design: The EHR was used for a retrospective analysis of all adults hospitalized between 2017 and 2022.

Participants: Hospitalized adults.

Main Measures: Patient demographics, structured diagnostic information, care area, length of stay, and in-hospital mortality, Z78.1 coding for physical restraints, restraint documentation in orders and flowsheets.

Key Results: Among 742,607 hospitalizations, 6.3% (n=47,041) involved the use of physical restraint based on coding or EHR documentation. Treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) included restraint in 39% of encounters whereas treatment outside the ICU included restraint use in 1.3% of encounters. Besides critical illness, demographic factors including increasing age (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.21 [1.19-1.23]), male gender (aOR=1.56, [1.52-1.60]), unknown race (aOR=1.27 [1.19-1.35]), and preferred language other than English (aOR=1.24, [1.18-1.29]) were associated with higher odds of restraint utilization. As compared to EHR orders or documentation of restraint, the ICD-10 code for physical restraint had a sensitivity of 1.5% and a specificity of 99.99%.

Conclusion: Among adults admitted to acute care hospitals, clinical, demographic, and operational factors were associated with increased odds of restraint, with care in the ICU associated with greatly increased odds of restraint. Research into restraint utilization using coded administrative claims data is likely limited by the sensitivity of physical restraint coding.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09113-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

physical restraint
16
restraint
13
physical restraints
12
odds restraint
12
physical
8
hospitalized patients
8
demographic factors
8
icd-10 code
8
icu included
8
included restraint
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!