Objective: To compare the risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity (TS) and gingival irritation (GI), as well as bleaching efficacy (BE) in the maxillary and mandibular arches after in-office dental bleaching.

Materials And Methods: 90 participants were randomly into two groups according to the arch (maxillary or mandibular) in which the patient will first receive a 35 % hydrogen peroxide gel (2 sessions; 1 × 30 min; 1 week apart). TS and GI were recorded immediately after, up to 1 h, 24 h and 48 h after bleaching, using the 0-10 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). BE was assessed before bleaching and 30 days after the end of the treatment (shade guide units [ΔSGU], CIELab [ΔE], CIEDE2000 [ΔE] and Whiteness Index for Dentistry [WI]). TS and GI were compared using McNemar's and paired t-test. BE were compared with Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test (ΔSGU) and paired t-test (ΔE, ΔE and WI) (α = 0.05).

Results: The risk and the intensity of TS was statistically higher for the mandibular arch (p < 0.003). The risk and intensity of GI did not differ between arches (p > 0.38). Both arches demonstrated significant BE (ΔSGU, ΔE, ΔE and WI), without differences between them (p > 0.08).

Conclusions: In-office dental bleaching induces higher risk and the intensity of TS in the mandibular arch when compared to maxillary arch, without significant differences in gingival irritation, or bleaching efficacy.

Clinical Relevance: Most patients experience tooth sensitivity regardless of the dental arch involved. However, when performing in-office dental bleaching, clinicians should consider that the mandibular arch is more likely to experience greater sensitivity compared to the maxillary arch.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105383DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

in-office dental
16
risk intensity
16
tooth sensitivity
12
dental bleaching
12
mandibular arch
12
gingival irritation
8
maxillary mandibular
8
paired t-test
8
Δe Δe
8
compared maxillary
8

Similar Publications

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of two non vital whitening techniques, In-office and Walking Bleach, using 35% hydrogen peroxide. The primary research question was to determine which technique achieves greater tooth color improvement.

Materials And Methods: Fifty non-vital anterior teeth with discoloration were randomly assigned to either the In-office (n = 25) or Walking Bleach (n = 25) groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of different types of bleaching methods and repolishing on the whiteness index and staining susceptibility of additive and subtractive production resin-based materials and direct composite resins.

Methods: In this study, a total of 96 samples (8*8*2m) were prepared using a nanohybrid composite resin (Neo Spectra-ST (NS)), a subtractive-manufactured nanoceramic resin (Cerasmart270 (CS)), and an additive-manufactured permanent resin (Saremco print Crowntec (CT)). The samples were randomly divided into four treatment groups: control (distilled water, 14 days), in-office bleaching (Opalescence Boost-40% HP, 3*20min), at-home bleaching (Opalescence PF-16% CP, 6 h, 14 days), and toothpaste group (Opalescence Whitening, 2*5min, 14 days) (n:8).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A geometric approach is presented that allows in-office planning with linear and angle corrections and surgical guide fabrication, simplifying the process when treating a fully edentulous arch.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Prediction based on machine learning of tooth sensitivity for in-office dental bleaching.

J Dent

December 2024

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Tuiuti University of Parana, Padre Ladislau Kula, 395, Santo Inácio, Curitiba, Paraná 82010-210, Brazil. Electronic address:

Objective: To develop a supervised machine learning model to predict the occurrence and intensity of tooth sensitivity (TS) in patients undergoing in-office dental bleaching testing various algorithm models.

Materials And Methods: Retrospective data from 458 patients were analyzed, including variables such as the occurrence and intensity of TS, basal tooth color, bleaching material characteristics (concentration and pH), intervention details (number and duration of applications), and patient age. Classification and regression models were evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation and assessed based on various performance parameters.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In office methods for immediate relief of dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) has long been an area of research. This study compared the efficacy of 660 nm diode laser, 980 nm diode laser, and amorphous calcium phosphate-casein phosphopeptide (ACP-CPP) agent in the treatment of DH. A total of 39 patients with minimum three hypersensitive teeth in at least one quadrant were selected and randomly divided into three groups; Group A, B, and C patients were treated by 660 nm diode laser, 980 nm diode laser, and ACP-CPP agent, respectively.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!