Spatial distribution and characteristics of women reporting cervical cancer screening in Malawi: An analysis of the 2020 to 2021 Malawi Population-based HIV Impact Assessment survey data.

Background: Malawi has one of the highest incidence and mortality rates of cervical cancer in the world. Despite a national strategic plan and the roll-out of VIA and screen-and-treat services, cervical cancer screening coverage in Malawi remains far below the national target.Using a nationally representative sample of women enumerated in the Malawi Population-based Impact Assessment (MPHIA) survey we estimated the prevalence and spatial distribution of self-reported cervical cancer screening as a proxy for uptake in Malawi.

Methods: MPHIA was a nationally representative household survey in Malawi, targeting adults aged 15 and above, that employed a cross-sectional, two-stage, cluster design. The primary aim of MPHIA was to assess the regional prevalence of viral load suppression and the progress towards achieving the UNAIDS 95-95-95 goals among adults aged 15 and above. The survey was carried out between January 2020 and April 2021. Prevalence of self-reported cervical cancer screening by different characteristics was estimated accounting for the survey design using the Taylor series approach. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression approaches to examine associations between the prevalence of cervical cancer screening and demographic characteristics.

Findings: A total of 13,067 adult (15 years and older) female individuals were surveyed during the MPHIA 2020 to 2021 survey, corresponding to a weighted total of 5,604,578. The prevalence of self-reported cervical cancer screening was 16.5% (95% CI 15.5-18.0%), with women living with HIV having a higher prevalence of 37.8% (95% CI 34.8-40.9) compared to 14.0% (95% CI 13.0-15.0) in HIV negative women. The highest prevalence of screening was reported in the Southwest zone (SWZ) (24.1%, 95% CI 21.3-26.9) and in major cities of Blantyre (25.9%, 95% CI 22.9-29.0), and Lilongwe (19.6%, 95% CI 18.0-21.3). Higher self-reported screening was observed in women who resided in urban regions ((22.7%; 95% CI 21.4-24.0) versus women who resided in rural areas (15.2%; 95% CI 14.0-16.8). Cervical cancer screening was strongly associated with being HIV positive (aOR 2.83; 95% CI 2.29-3.50), ever having been pregnant (aOR 1.93; 95% CI 1.19-3.14), attaining higher education level than secondary education (aOR 2.74; 95% CI 1.67-4.52) and being in the highest wealth quintile (aOR 2.86; 95% CI 2.01-4.08).

Interpretation: The coverage of cervical cancer screening in Malawi remains low and unequal by region and wealth/education class. Current screening efforts are largely being focussed on women accessing HIV services. There is need for deliberate interventions to upscale cervical cancer screening in both HIV negative women and women living with HIV.