AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the effectiveness of blended treatment (combining online and face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy) for adolescents with depressive disorders, focusing on the quality of the therapeutic alliance.* -
  • A total of 85 participants, aged 13-22, were assessed for depressive symptoms and therapeutic alliance over multiple time points, but no significant differences were found between blended treatment and face-to-face treatment.* -
  • The study concluded that despite the absence of differences in therapeutic alliance ratings, it still needs further research to understand its relationship with treatment outcomes for depression.*

Article Abstract

Introduction: A depressive disorder during adolescence is a serious and disabling disorder, which has a high impact on the development of adolescents. Blended treatment, combining online and face-to-face sessions, is effective and can reduce some of the barriers for adolescents to use mental health care. There is a lack of knowledge about whether therapeutic alliance is established in blended treatment for adolescents and young adults suffering from a depressive disorder. This study examines whether the quality of the therapeutic alliance differs when cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) is delivered in combination with online intervention (b-CBT) compared to solely face-to-face (FtF-CBT) and the extent to which a stronger therapeutic alliance is associated with better treatment outcome.

Methods: A pragmatic quasi-experimental design was used. Data collected within two separate studies were combined. A total of 85 participants (80 % female), aged 13-22 (mean = 16.63, SD = 1.92) were recruited within mental health care institutions and diagnosed with a depressive disorder (using K-SADS). Assessments were done at pre-treatment (T0), after five weeks (T1), after ten weeks (T2), post-treatment (T3) and one to four weeks after treatment (T4) and included measures of depressive symptomatology (CDI-2). The therapeutic alliance was measured at T1, T2 and T3 by the TASC. -tests for independent samples were used to test differences in therapeutic alliance rates between b-CBT and FtF-CBT at post-treatment. A linear growth model for depressive symptoms based on five time points with Latent Growth Curve Analysis (LGCA) was used to test whether the therapeutic alliance is associated with depressive symptoms.

Results: No differences in therapeutic alliance between b-CBT and FtF-CBT were found on either client-rated or therapist-rated therapeutic alliance. For both intervention groups, no significant association between the therapeutic alliance and depressive outcome was found.

Discussion: This study shows that providing part of CBT using an online environment does not have a negative impact on the therapeutic alliance. In contrast to earlier research, no association was found between the therapeutic alliance and therapy outcome in neither the b-CBT nor the FtF-CBT intervention.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11462362PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2024.100776DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

therapeutic alliance
48
depressive disorder
16
therapeutic
12
b-cbt ftf-cbt
12
alliance
11
adolescents young
8
young adults
8
depressive
8
blended treatment
8
mental health
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!