Background And Aims: One major limitation of the spinal block remains the inability to extend the duration of the block intraoperatively unless planned before with spinal or epidural catheters and/or intrathecal additives. This study was designed to compare the effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine versus low-dose ketamine-dexmedetomidine combination infusion on spinal anaesthesia in lower limb orthopaedic surgeries.
Methods: This randomised study was conducted in 60 patients scheduled for unilateral lower limb surgeries under spinal anaesthesia. Patients were randomised into Group D ( = 30) (0.5 µg/kg of intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine bolus followed by maintenance infusion at 0.5 µg/kg/h) and Group LKD ( = 30) (IV bolus of 0.5 µg/kg of dexmedetomidine and 0.2 mg/kg of ketamine, followed by maintenance infusions of dexmedetomidine and ketamine at 0.5 µg/kg/h and 0.2 mg/kg/h, respectively). Ramsay Sedation Scale score of 3-4 was maintained. The -test or the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the parameters between groups.
Results: The mean sacral segment 1 (S1) regression time was 390.3 [standard deviation (SD):84.38] [95% confidence interval (CI): 360.13, 420.53] versus 393.23 (SD: 93.01) (95% CI: 363.04, 423.43) min in Group D versus Group LKD respectively (( = 0.701). The number of episodes of hypotension was significantly higher in Group D (19 patients) compared to Group LKD (nine patients) ( = 0.001). Pre- and postoperative stress markers (24 h) and the incidence of postoperative nausea and shivering were comparable between the two groups ( > 0.05). Tramadol requirement in the postoperative period was significantly less in Group LKD compared to Group D ( = 0.003).
Conclusion: The duration of S1 regression was similar between group dexmedetomidine (Group D) and group low-dose ketamine and dexmedetomidine (Group LKD).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11460815 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_14_24 | DOI Listing |
Clin Transplant
December 2024
Department of Surgery I Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
J Clin Med
October 2024
Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy.
Indian J Anaesth
September 2024
Department of Anaesthesia, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, New Delhi, India.
BMJ Open Respir Res
February 2024
Imperial College London, London, UK.
Objectives: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) are immunomodulatory treatments in interstitial lung disease (ILD). This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of MMF or AZA on pulmonary function in ILD.
Design: Population included any ILD diagnosis, intervention included MMF or AZA treatment, outcome was delta change from baseline in per cent predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC) and gas transfer (diffusion lung capacity of carbon monoxide, %DLco).
J Community Genet
April 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Clinical chatbots are increasingly used to help integrate genetic testing into clinical contexts, but no chatbot exists for Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) genetic testing of living kidney donor (LKD) candidates of African ancestry. Our study aimed to culturally adapt and assess perceptions of the Gia® chatbot to help integrate APOL1 testing into LKD evaluation. Ten focus groups and post-focus group surveys were conducted with 54 LKDs, community members, and kidney transplant recipients of African ancestry.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!