Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic value of 16α- 18 F-fluoro-17β-fluoroestradiol ( 18 F-FES) PET/CT for distant metastasis or recurrence in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer.
Methods: Patients with ER-positive breast cancer and suspected of de novo metastasis or recurrence were retrospectively identified from a prospective cohort enrolled for a postmarketing surveillance study of 18 F-FES at our institution. Per-patient diagnostic accuracy was assessed using pathology or 2 or more standard-of-care imaging procedures with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up as the reference standard. The per-region detection rate of 18 F-FES PET/CT was evaluated and compared with that of standard-of-care imaging.
Results: Of the 162 included patients, 104 and 58 were suspected to have recurrence or de novo metastasis, respectively. The overall sensitivity and specificity of 18 F-FES PET/CT were 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89%-98%) and 89% (95% CI, 76%-96%), respectively. When stratified according to clinical settings, the sensitivity and specificity were 95% (95% CI, 88%-99%) and 96% (95% CI, 78%-100%), respectively, for detecting recurrence, and 94% (95% CI, 81%-99%) and 82% (95% CI, 60%-95%) for detecting distant metastasis. In region-based analysis, the overall detection rate of 18 F-FES PET/CT was significantly higher than that of standard-of-care imaging (92% [95% CI, 89%-94%] vs 83% [95% CI, 79%-87%], P < 0.001).
Conclusions: 18 F-FES PET/CT showed excellent diagnostic performance in patients with ER-positive breast cancer suspected of de novo metastasis or recurrence.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000005447 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!