Automated detection and classification of mandibular fractures on multislice spiral computed tomography using modified convolutional neural networks.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, P.R. China; Institution of Medical Sciences, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, P.R. China. Electronic address:

Published: December 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess how well convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can automatically detect and classify mandibular fractures using multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) data from 361 patients.
  • Different detection models, including YOLOv3 and YOLOv5-TRS, were evaluated, with YOLOv5-TRS achieving the highest accuracy of 96.68% for detecting fractures.
  • For classification, the modified DenseNet-121 model performed best, showing a high reliability in diagnosing fractures, particularly in the body region, indicated by AUC values above 0.75.

Article Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the performance of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the automated detection and classification of mandibular fractures on multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT).

Study Design: MSCT data from 361 patients with mandibular fractures were retrospectively collected. Two experienced maxillofacial surgeons annotated the images as ground truth. Fractures were detected utilizing the following models: YOLOv3, YOLOv4, Faster R-CNN, CenterNet, and YOLOv5-TRS. Fracture sites were classified by the following models: AlexNet, GoogLeNet, ResNet50, original DenseNet-121, and modified DenseNet-121. The performance was evaluated for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). AUC values were compared using the Z-test and P values <.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Results: Of all of the detection models, YOLOv5-TRS obtained the greatest mean accuracy (96.68%). Among all of the fracture subregions, body fractures were the most reliably detected (with accuracies of 88.59%-99.01%). For classification models, the AUCs for body fractures were higher than those of condyle and angle fractures, and they were all above 0.75, with the highest AUC at 0.903. Modified DenseNet-121 had the best overall classification performance with a mean AUC of 0.814.

Conclusions: The modified CNN-based models demonstrated high reliability for the diagnosis of mandibular fractures on MSCT.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2024.07.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mandibular fractures
12
automated detection
8
detection classification
8
classification mandibular
8
fractures multislice
8
multislice spiral
8
spiral computed
8
computed tomography
8
convolutional neural
8
neural networks
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!